Me Vs The Bug

Content Penguins do not fly, they swim (Learn CSS Transforms by Building a Penguin - Step 86) 53288 O Closed wblondel opened this issue on Jan 20 2 comments wblondel commented on Jan 20 edited Contributor Describe the Issue On the 86th step of the "Learn CSS Transforms by Building a Penguin" course in the "Responsive Web Design" certification, this fun fact is shown Fun fact: Penguins cannot fly without wings. 1 believe this is a mistake, because even with wings, penguins cannot fly. However, they need them to swim. Affected Page https:www.freecodecamp.orglearn2022responsive-web-designlearn-css-transforms-by-building-a-penguinstep-86 Your code NA Expected behavior In my opinion, the fun fact should be replaced with: Fun fact: Penguins cannot swim without wings. Assignees ShaunSHamilton Labels (scope: curriculum (type: bug Projects None yet Milestone No milestone Development No branches or pull requests Notifications Customize A Subscribe You're not receiving notifications from this thread.

Dad's not a veterinarian—he's a debugger ! The kid thinks daddy can fix a hedgehog because "he fixes bugs every day," but plot twist: those animal books are actually programming manuals with cute critters on the covers! Python, C#, JavaScript... turns out the only animals this dev dad knows are the ones living in his code forest. The ultimate dad joke that works on two levels—just like a good inheritance hierarchy!

The classic "monkey puppet" meme perfectly captures the thousand-yard stare of veteran programmers when someone claims "you don't need to be a programmer to write software." That statement might sound innocent to the uninitiated, but anyone who survived Visual Basic, FrontPage, and Dreamweaver in the 90s knows the horror that follows. Sure, drag-and-drop interfaces made software "accessible" – right until you had to debug the absolute nightmare of auto-generated code that looked like it was written by a caffeinated toddler with a keyboard. The right panel showing ancient UI builder software is giving me flashbacks I didn't consent to.

The gradual transformation into a complete clown represents the self-delusion of developers who think their undocumented code will somehow remain comprehensible over time. Sure, you wrote it yesterday and understand it perfectly. Fast forward six months and you'll be staring at your own creation like it's written in hieroglyphics. Future you will hate present you. Your teammates? They've already started building the voodoo doll.

Content Check, the Dog O Follow permit io Happy Thanksgiving to all the European developers who are celebrating 48 hours of no meetings, and our apologies to our American friends who are busy fixing Gramma's printer.

Ah, the classic interrogation scene but with a coding twist. The detective isn't asking about a murder—he's confronting the suspect about that mythical "future refactoring" everyone promises but never delivers. You know the drill: "I'll clean up this horrific spaghetti code later" becomes a cold case faster than you can say "technical debt." That poor developer in the hospital gown is all of us when our past coding sins finally catch up and the system crashes in production. The only difference between this interrogation and real life is that in real life, we're both the detective AND the suspect. Trust me, your "I'll fix it next sprint" promises are fooling nobody—especially not your future self.