Using Claude Opus

When Jensen Huang trades his iconic leather jacket for a suit, you know GPU prices are about to make your wallet cry harder than a junior dev facing legacy code without documentation. The man's fashion choices are literally a NASDAQ indicator at this point. Leather jacket Jensen: "We're innovating!" Suit Jensen: "We're strategically adjusting our value proposition upward by 300%."

Welcome to the dystopian future where Big Tech has finally achieved their ultimate dream: making you pay a subscription fee just to use your OWN computer! OpenAI and Samsung are now the RAM police, hunting down anyone who dares to run calculations on their own hardware without a monthly license. Got 32GB of DDR5 hidden under your floorboards like it's Prohibition-era moonshine? BUSTED. They're literally treating local compute like contraband now. Next thing you know, they'll be kicking down doors asking "Where's the GPU, punk?" while you're desperately trying to explain that you just wanted to run a Python script offline. The cloud overlords have won, and your CPU is now considered a controlled substance. Rent, don't own—it's the Silicon Valley way!

Nothing says "increased productivity" quite like inheriting your manager's workload after they got axed for "efficiency gains." Sure, you could've been cranking out AI-generated code like a factory line, but instead you chose the artisanal route of actually writing software. The reward? Congratulations, you're now a developer-manager hybrid with zero pay bump and twice the meetings. The AI was supposed to replace the boring stuff, not create a corporate restructuring speedrun. At least when the AI hallucinates a solution, it doesn't have to attend the retrospective to explain why.

OpenAI just declared the AI race is "over" if they can't train models on copyrighted content without permission. You know, because apparently innovation dies the moment you have to actually license the data you're using. The bottom panel really nails it—10/10 car thieves would also agree that laws against stealing are terrible for business. Same energy, different industry. It's the corporate equivalent of "Your Honor, if I can't copy my neighbor's homework, how am I supposed to pass the class?" Sure, training AI models on massive datasets is expensive and complicated, but so is respecting intellectual property. Wild concept, I know.

Oh honey, the DELUSION is REAL! 💅 These poor souls thinking they've discovered some revolutionary concept where we'll just "write specifications" and *poof* - code appears! The absolute DRAMA when they realize that writing a "comprehensive and precise spec" is LITERALLY JUST WRITING CODE with extra steps! It's like saying "I've invented a way to avoid cooking - I'll just write extremely detailed instructions for someone else to follow!" Congratulations, you've invented a recipe, which is STILL COOKING! The programmer's smug "It's called code" at the end is sending me to the MOON! This is the software development equivalent of reinventing the wheel and calling it a "circular motion enablement device." I cannot with these people! 😂

Content WSL. BEGOMES COPEN SOURCE MICROSOFT LAYING OFF 6000 EMPLOYEES imgflip.com