Birds Are Better Than AI

The classic "rules for thee but not for me" saga starring OpenAI! First panel shows them smugly scraping the entire internet like digital pirates, building ChatGPT on everyone else's copyrighted content without so much as a "pretty please." But when a Chinese company does the exact same thing to them? Suddenly they're clutching their pearls and reading law books! Turns out intellectual property only matters when it's your intellectual property being "borrowed." The hypocrisy is so thick you could train a neural network on it.

When your non-tech friend asks what you're doing and you say "I'm coding," but really you're just asking ChatGPT to build the next billion-dollar startup for you. Let's be honest—we've all typed "make me an app like [insert successful company]" at least once when nobody was looking. The modern equivalent of copying homework, except now we call it "leveraging AI tools for rapid prototyping." Who needs years of software engineering when you can just sweet-talk an AI into doing it for you?

When AI "enhancement" goes beyond fixing pixels and straight into identity theft. The algorithm looked at a low-res image and thought, "You know what would make this better? A completely different person!" It's like asking for image upscaling and getting witness protection instead. This is why developers shouldn't let their neural networks watch crime shows during training.

The classic "ChatGPT will make me rich" delusion meets reality. Someone asks their AI overlord to generate a million-dollar app with zero bugs, and you can practically see the existential crisis unfolding in real-time as they realize the output is... less than stellar. The contradiction is chef's kiss: "make me an app that makes $1M/month" + "don't make any mistakes" = asking AI to solve problems that actual billion-dollar companies with armies of engineers still can't crack. Meanwhile, ChatGPT probably just generated a todo list app with hardcoded credentials and SQL injection vulnerabilities. If getting rich was as easy as typing a prompt, we'd all be retired on a beach somewhere instead of debugging production at 3 AM. But hey, at least the AI-generated code compiles... sometimes.

The AUDACITY of recommendation algorithms thinking they know me! 😤 While mere mortals click links with reckless abandon, we programmers are out here playing 4D chess with YouTube's AI. Copy link? ✓ Incognito mode? ✓ Digital footprint OBLITERATED! The sheer PARANOIA of thinking "if I click this ONE video about mechanical keyboards, my entire feed will become nothing but clicky-clacky keyboard ASMR until the END OF TIME!" It's not being dramatic when YouTube literally turns one casual click into your entire personality!

The ultimate statistical irony: a bell curve meme about bell curves that perfectly follows... a bell curve. You've got the low-IQ folks who think bell curves are funny because "haha, pretty graph go brrr," the high-IQ intellectuals who appreciate bell curves for the exact same reason, and the middle-of-the-curve galaxy brains screaming "BAN BELL CURVES!!1!" with the intensity of someone who just discovered their entire codebase uses tabs instead of spaces. The distribution of opinions about bell curves literally forms a bell curve, and that's the kind of recursive humor that keeps me going through sprint planning meetings.