Back To The Prompt Future

Corporate strategy in 2024: Watch AI zoom by, panic, grab it mid-flight, then pretend you were steering it all along. CEOs worldwide mastering the art of the strategic pivot from "what's generative AI?" to "we've always been an AI-first company." Nothing says executive leadership like retrofitting the arrow of progress into your PowerPoint after it's already been fired.

Content Also, they have an extremely aged 3Com switch that was End of Life in 2009 and has not received a firmware update since the Bush administration.

Reddit programming subs in a nutshell: GitHub Copilot adding over a million lines of code while removing just 332. Then there's the "vibe coders" adding 153K lines but deleting 9K. This is the digital equivalent of that coworker who writes 500 lines to do what could be done in 10. Sure, the git stats look impressive, but someone's gonna have to maintain that monstrosity after they move on to their next "10x developer" gig. The real heroes are the ones who commit -5000 lines that make everything run twice as fast. But they don't get Reddit karma, do they?

Someone just let Claude loose on operating system development and it actually produced something bootable. VibeOS features a file manager with a duck.png, a web browser that can navigate to "motherfuckingwebsite.com" (truly a mark of quality), and what appears to be a calculator app. The README casually admits "not everything works, some stuff is not even tested, but most things do" which is honestly more transparency than most enterprise software gives you. The fact that an AI managed to vibe-code an entire operating system while your production deployment is still broken from that hotfix three weeks ago really puts things in perspective. At least when VibeOS crashes, you can blame it on the AI not having feelings about your bug reports.

The double standard of AI acceptance is painfully real. Write code with AI? The dev community collectively snores. Generate a slightly wonky sunset image? Suddenly everyone's a digital art critic with opinions stronger than their coffee. The tech world's selective outrage meter is basically: AI-generated code that powers critical infrastructure: Meh, whatever works AI-generated art with one too many fingers: CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY! Meanwhile, artists are in the corner watching their jobs evaporate while developers keep telling themselves "AI just helps me code faster" as it quietly writes their entire authentication system.

The modern developer's dilemma: use AI to speed through tasks like a productivity god, or spend your entire afternoon debugging cryptic errors in code you didn't write, don't understand, and honestly have no idea how it even compiled in the first place. The ghost costume is particularly fitting—you're literally haunted by AI-generated code that works until it doesn't, and then you're stuck explaining to your senior dev why you can't fix a bug in code that might as well be written in ancient Sumerian. The guy wearing a shirt that literally says "BUG" is the cherry on top—because that's your entire identity now. You've gone from "software engineer" to "AI code archaeologist" real quick. Fun fact: Studies show developers spend about 35-50% of their time debugging. With AI-generated code, you're debugging faster... but also debugging code you have zero ownership of. It's like inheriting legacy code, except the "legacy" developer is a neural network that can't answer your Slack messages.