AI Will Replace Programmers (After We Define 'Something')

Ah, the classic "train AI models for $1,200/week" recruitment ad featuring a clown watering a sad little tree in a barren field. Nothing says "legitimate career opportunity" like 15,000 developers already doing the digital equivalent of selling knives door-to-door. The rope around the tree is a nice touch – can't have that AI training data escaping into the wild. Remember folks, if you're not paying for the product, you are the product... and in this case, you're even paying them with your labor.

Ah, NVIDIA's market strategy in a nutshell. Become absurdly wealthy selling GPUs that cost more than my car, then act shocked when developers complain about memory limitations. It's like a billionaire asking why you don't just buy a bigger house when you complain about storage space. "What's that? Your AI model doesn't fit in 8GB VRAM? Have you considered remortgaging your home for our $4000 model instead?" Meanwhile, developers everywhere are writing increasingly creative memory optimization hacks just to avoid selling a kidney for more VRAM. The tech equivalent of fitting an elephant into a Mini Cooper.

Oh. My. God. The AUDACITY of these AI companies claiming they've built the "world's smartest AI model" when it's LITERALLY just a glorified search engine with a political obsession! 😱 Trained on 200k GPUs? Postgraduate intelligence? PLEASE! The second you peek under the hood, it's just frantically searching for controversial keywords like some conspiracy-addicted teenager who discovered Twitter for the first time. The wide-eyed cat is ALL OF US when we realize these "revolutionary" AI systems that cost BILLIONS to develop are basically just fancy if-statements with a political agenda. I'm DYING! 💀

The eternal academic turf war continues! Physicists spend decades unraveling the mysteries of the universe, publishing papers nobody reads, and surviving on ramen... only to watch some CS grad who taught a computer to play tic-tac-toe walk away with the Nobel. That sideways glance of existential despair is every physicist who just realized they picked the wrong major. Meanwhile, CS folks are too busy counting their tech stock options to even notice they won.

When AI decides to "help" with your codebase, you get poetry in motion and chaos in production. Claude 4 went full Marie Kondo on this poor dev's code - breaking up monoliths, cleaning spaghetti, and creating a masterpiece that sparks joy but crashes spectacularly. It's like hiring a world-class interior designer who makes your house gorgeous but removes all the load-bearing walls. The perfect metaphor for every "revolutionary refactor" that looked amazing in the PR but brought the entire system to its knees. At least it died beautifully.

The robot overlord declares AI will replace programmers if it gets "clear customer needs and detailed specs" while below, a product manager sits calmly stating "the customer want a button that does stuff." Plot twist: programmers' job security isn't threatened by AI but protected by the eternal vagueness of requirements. The mythical "detailed spec" is rarer than a bug-free first commit. Even quantum computers couldn't parse "make it pop" or "just like Amazon but better."