Javascript Memes

The eternal screaming void of nested conditionals. Every developer has stared into the abyss of a codebase with so many else if statements that you need archaeological tools to find where it all began. That moment when you inherit legacy code with 17 levels of if-else chains and zero comments. The horrified faces perfectly capture the existential dread of realizing you'll need to refactor this monstrosity before you can add your "simple feature." Pro tip: If your conditional logic needs its own zip code, maybe it's time for a switch statement or a strategy pattern. Your future self will thank you instead of screaming into the void.

Content STEAM MACHINE NEEDS BETTER HARDWARE THAN OTHER CONSOLES OR IT WILL FAIL! IT WOULD BE TOO EXPENSIVE AND PEOPLE WOULD JUST BUY A PC INSTEAD! What if the Steam Machine launches at $500 and allows the user to buy & swap out the hardware it comes with for better hardware if they want to?

Content STOP DOING OS • CPUS WERE NOT MEANT TO BE SHARED! • YEARS OF SCHEDULERS yet NO REAL-WORLD USE FOUND for running more than one task at a time! • Wanted to terminate a process? We had a tool for that. It was called manual restart. • "Please give me 30 bytes of virtual memory. Please allocate it on the heap. ' - Statements dreamed up by evil wizards. LOOK at what kernel developers have been demanding your respect for all this time, with all the memory and CPUS we built for them. (This is REAL KERNEL CODE, done by REAL KERNEL DEVS): prev_state = READ_ONCE(prev->__state); if (sched mode == SM IDLE) { * This is how we return from a fork. * SCX must consult the BPF scheduler to if (Irq->nr_running 88 !scx_enabled()) { i SYM_CODE_START(ret_from_fork) next = prev; bl schedule_tail goto picked; cbz x19, 1f MOV x0, x20 } else if (! preempt 8& prev_state) { try_to_block_task(rq, prev, prev_state); switch_count = &prev->nvcsw; blr X19 1: get_current_task tsk MoV X0, sp } bl asm_exit_to_user_mode ret_to_user next = pick_next_task(rq, prev, &rf); rq_set_donor(rq, next); SYM_CODE_END(ret_from_fork) NOKPROBE(ret_from_fork) STOCALE UEFANEX drag pushO: __diag_ignore(GCC, 8, "-Wattribute-alias", dancinkage cong sysomndnes Marta, aC vecc, VA AKUS_/ attribute (altas( stringity( se systanane)))); ONGsystanane, ERRNO); _do_systinare(__MAP(X,__SC_DECL,_VA_ARGS_ _se_sysmenare(__MAP(X,__SC_LONG,__VA_ARGS__)): se sysauname MAP(X, SC LONG,VA ARGS_)) do sussunare MAP(X. SC CAST, VA ARGS. _MAP(X, __SC_TEST,__VA_ARGS_ -PROTECT(x, ret,__MAP(X, __SC_ARGS, _VA_ARGS__)): 10000 94 static inline long SYSCALL DESTEX - do systanare (_MaP(X, _ SC_DECL, _ VA ARGS_ ????? ?????? ??????????? Hello I would like to a process please. They have played us for absolute fools.

Let's be honest - JSON is what happens when you give CSV a makeover and tell it to wear a suit to the interview. Sure, it's got fancy curly braces and proper nesting, but strip away the syntactic sugar and what do you have? The same damn tabular data with extra steps. Every frontend dev who's spent hours parsing nested JSON only to flatten it into a simple table for display knows that feeling of "why did we even bother?" Meanwhile, TOML and YAML are sitting in the corner wondering why JSON gets all the attention when they've been better options all along. The cat's reaction perfectly captures that moment when you realize your API could've just returned a simple CSV and saved everyone 40% of the bandwidth.

The syntax evolution of conditional statements is a wild ride! First we have "Elsif" - the fancy Pascal/Ada way that makes you feel like you're coding with a monocle. Then "elif" arrives as Python's sleek, minimalist approach (because who needs those extra letters anyway?). "else if" shows up as the sensible middle ground used in C/C++/Java that actually reads like English. But then... the posh British gentleman at the bottom with "otherwise" - that's some proper Ruby/Haskell functional programming elegance right there. It's like watching conditional statements get progressively more sophisticated until they're sipping tea with their pinky out.

OH MY GOD, the AUDACITY of this little brother making actual GAMES from SCRATCH while the rest of us are just gluing together AI libraries like absolute PEASANTS! 😱 The sheer BETRAYAL of watching your sibling learn Java and pixel art while you're trapped in NextJS dependency hell! But secretly? You're INSANELY proud because that kid is learning programming the hard way - building everything from the ground up instead of just importing someone else's solution. Your brother might be coding like it's 2005, but he's developing ACTUAL skills while you're just another AI-prompt engineer waiting for ChatGPT to fix your bugs. The future is his, and you know it!

Top panel: "How to make a responsive website" written on a whiteboard by someone who's about to drop some knowledge bombs. Bottom panel: Their actual website telling mobile users "Screen width too small. Please increase the window size or rotate to load. If you are on a mobile phone, please open on a desktop." Nothing says "I'm a responsive design expert" quite like a website that doesn't work on mobile. It's the digital equivalent of a swimming instructor who can't swim but has a really nice PowerPoint about water.

THE AUDACITY of code autocomplete suggesting "don't" when I'm trying to write a regex! DARLING, I'm not having an existential crisis in my IDE—I'm trying to match patterns! The computer is literally telling me "don't" like it's my disappointed mother watching me write another cursed regular expression at 2AM. And it's RIGHT. Nobody should be writing regex. NOBODY. It's like the IDE gained sentience just to stage an intervention! 💅

The eternal struggle of API development in one perfect image. On one side, we've got the "Virgin API Consumer" - chained by OAuth, rate limits, and enough verification steps to make the DMV jealous. Poor soul thinks they're making life easier while submitting DNA samples just to fetch some JSON. Meanwhile, the "Chad Third-Party Scraper" is living his best digital life with Selenium, cURL, and regex abominations that would make your CS professor weep. This absolute madlad crashes backends, dodges JavaScript protections, and outsources CAPTCHA solving to some poor souls for pennies. The true comedy? Companies spend millions on API security while Chad's weekend project scrapes their entire database before lunch. Ten years in the industry and I've never seen anything more accurate than "429 Too Many Requests" vs "promising career at high-frequency trading firm."

Ah yes, JavaScript. Nature's way of warning us that something might bite. The yellow JS logo sitting there among actual venomous creatures is the perfect evolutionary adaptation - bright coloring that screams "approach with caution, side effects may include undefined behavior and callback hell." Developers have evolved to recognize this warning sign, yet we still poke it with a stick daily. Natural selection at its finest.

The eternal cycle of data format reinvention continues. TOON appears to be yet another attempt to make data more readable than JSON, which itself was supposed to be more readable than XML, which was more readable than... you get the idea. The kicker? TOON uses 154 chars while JSON needs 412 for the same data. Sure, it's more compact, but at what cost? Another syntax to learn, another parser to debug at 2AM when production breaks. The Rick and Morty reaction perfectly captures that weary sigh of "here we go again" that echoes through developer souls whenever someone announces they've invented a revolutionary new data format.

Remember when we just wrote code without caring about whose "style" it was? Now we've got eight different ways to place your damn curly braces and whitespace in a simple while loop. Kernighan & Ritchie put the opening brace on the same line, GNU indents it differently, and Lisp style crams everything together like code real estate costs a fortune. And don't get me started on Haskell style with those bizarre semicolons. The funniest part? We'll still argue for hours about which one is "correct" while the actual functionality remains identical. Twenty years in this industry and we're still fighting about cosmetics instead of solving real problems.