Do British Websites Use Biscuits?

OH. MY. GOD. Welcome to the JavaScript circus of horrors where zero equals a string of "0.0" but zero with an 'n' doesn't?! And then—PLOT TWIST—the string "0.0" with a NOT operator suddenly equals zero with an 'n'?! 💀 This is the EXACT moment your brain cells commit mass suicide during a coding session. JavaScript's type coercion is like that toxic ex who keeps changing the rules mid-argument. "Yeah, that makes sense" turns into "WHAT THE ACTUAL HELL IS HAPPENING" faster than you can say "use TypeScript instead."

OH. MY. GOD. The BRUTAL truth about our toxic relationship with AI coding assistants! 💅 We're literally gambling our productivity away with these AI slot machines! Type a vague prompt, hit "Generate" and PRAY TO THE CODING GODS that you'll get something that doesn't make your compiler have an existential crisis! "Just one more prompt, I swear this will fix it!" - me, 47 prompts later, sobbing into my energy drink while my deadline approaches at the speed of light. Meanwhile, OpenAI is cackling all the way to the bank! The absolute AUDACITY of spending 3 hours prompting for something that would take 20 minutes to code yourself. But here we are, calling ourselves "prompt engineers" like we've invented a new profession instead of admitting we're just gambling addicts in developer hoodies! 💁‍♀️

The expectation vs. reality of frontend development is perfectly captured in this Squid Game cookie comparison. You start thinking it's just drawing a simple triangle—clean lines, minimal effort. Then reality hits and suddenly you're meticulously carving a fractal nightmare of nested triangles where one wrong move breaks everything. Just like when your CSS looks perfect until someone opens it on a different browser and your beautiful design transforms into an eldritch horror. The only difference is that in Squid Game you die quickly; with frontend, you suffer for eternity trying to center a div.

The git diff shows Firefox removing their FAQ answer about not selling personal data. Nothing says "we value privacy" quite like deleting the promise not to sell it! Clearly Firefox decided the best way to compete with Chrome was to speedrun the "Either die a hero or live long enough to become the villain" challenge. That deletion is worth a thousand privacy policies. For those wondering, this is from Firefox's structured-data-firefox-faq.html file where they've removed the entire Q&A about not selling user data. The irony is palpable - they kept the "Why is Firefox so slow?" question though. At least they've got their priorities straight!

Oh look, another UI/UX "improvement" that strips away all useful details! Left: Earth with its messy continents, textures, and actual information. Right: The designer's "clean" version—a minimalist gradient sphere that tells you absolutely nothing but looks "modern." This is basically what happens when the design team gets too much power in a sprint planning meeting. "Users don't need to see countries, that's information overload! Let's simplify!" Next update: continents will be available as a premium subscription feature.

Shocking revelation: you can build software without paying for fancy SaaS tools. Next up: water is wet. This thumbnail perfectly captures the "enlightened developer" phenomenon where someone discovers open source alternatives to paid services and acts like they've cracked the Da Vinci code. Sure, you could pay for Replit, Lovable, or Bolt... or you could just use the thousands of free tools that have existed since the dawn of computing. Revolutionary stuff here, folks. Your wallet and that shocked expression on your face can finally take a break.