Am I The Only One Tired Of Chatbots?

The perfect visualization of scope creep in web development! What starts as a cute little kid wanting a few technologies (MongoDB, Redis, Angular) turns into a database apocalypse. First frame: "I only need 5 requests per minute!" Second frame: "Just a few tables with hundreds of records!" By the final frame, this innocent project has transformed into a resource-devouring monster with Oracle, Hadoop, and every framework under the sun strapped to it, terrorizing the server playground while screaming "MAKE WAY LOSERS! I'M ABOUT TO PROCESS MY 5 USERS!" The irony of overengineering a solution that serves practically no one is just *chef's kiss*. It's that side project that started with "I'll just use a simple stack" and somehow ended up with Kubernetes.

Oh my gosh, the infinite loop of code theft! 😂 First StackOverflow gives ChatGPT all its knowledge, then ChatGPT claims it made it. Then a programmer steals from ChatGPT and proudly declares "I made this!" Only for the code to eventually make its way back to StackOverflow! It's the perfect representation of the modern dev cycle: copy from StackOverflow → paste into ChatGPT → ask for improvements → copy to your project → claim full credit in your performance review! The circle of code life!

The progression from "HTML is basic makeup" to "CSS adds some color" is fine, but then suddenly HTTP is portrayed as rocket science? Give me a break. The real punchline is creating an entire JavaScript framework because apparently making a GET request is too complicated. This is why we have 47 versions of React knockoffs and your website takes 15 seconds to load a button. Frontend development in 2024: where we solve problems we created ourselves with solutions that create more problems.

Ah, the classic CSS battle against invisible elements. Setting z-index to 99999 is basically the frontend equivalent of yelling "COME OUT, I KNOW YOU'RE IN THERE!" at your monitor. Meanwhile, your div is probably hiding behind another element with position: relative that you forgot about three hours ago. The true villain isn't the z-index—it's the CSS stacking context that silently judges your desperate attempts at bringing elements forward. After eight years of frontend development, I've learned that no matter how big your z-index number is, there's always some parent container laughing at your pathetic attempts to control the layout.

The classic developer blame game in its natural habitat! The backend dev secretly passes a note with their broken code to the frontend dev, who opens it only to find the dreaded "500 Internal Server Error." The frontend dev's face says it all—pure rage at being handed a server problem they can't fix but will absolutely get blamed for when users start complaining. It's like ordering a pizza and receiving an empty box with a note saying "we're out of ingredients, you figure it out." The eternal backend-frontend relationship summarized in two panels of pure frustration.

The punchline hits harder than a 500 server error. Someone names their bin chute spider "Henry" - harmless enough. But then comes the revelation: "he's a web developer." Just your typical developer humor - naming spiders after their natural profession. The spider probably writes cleaner code than most of us and never complains about legacy systems. Bet Henry specializes in crawling and doesn't even need Stack Overflow for help.