It's Not A Bug, It's A Feature

Content Hey, are you sleeping? Yes, now shut up I know how to fix that error on line 183! ngflip

That moment of existential horror when you open up code from six months ago and find your 17-paragraph manifesto explaining a single function. Past you really thought future you would need a dissertation on why you used a for-loop instead of map(). Bonus points if the comment is longer than the actual code and includes phrases like "DO NOT TOUCH THIS OR EVERYTHING WILL EXPLODE" and "I'm so sorry for whoever has to maintain this." Plot twist: it's still you.

Content Anonymous - (-1) (68) (5151401344 13501409) (8)1(41): (6-10820) 44-375 41 KB JPG Anonymous X 3.14; 031222(Sat)21:25:49 No.86027027 What is the most efficient or fastest computer algorithm to calculate the digits of pi? How would a formula like picrelated be implemented into a computer program in such a way that it works with the maximum possible speed? 031222(Sat)21:28:17 No.86027042

Oh honey, Doxygen just asked "how's it goin?" and unleashed the GATES OF HELL! 😱 That diagram is what happens when your "clean code" meets reality - a catastrophic spider web of dependencies that would make even the most seasoned developer question their career choices. No amount of auto-documentation can save you from the nightmare that is spaghetti code. It's like putting lipstick on a garbage fire! The transition from "hey how's it goin?" to pure existential crisis is the most accurate representation of documentation day I've ever seen. Doxygen didn't just generate documentation - it generated a MAP OF YOUR SINS! 💀

The real bug in your code isn't a syntax error - it's that FPS counter permanently burned into your screenshots. Nothing says "I'm debugging while gaming" like accidentally sending your boss a screenshot with CPU: 47%, RAM: 4GB, and FPS: 112. That black cat is just judging your life choices from the corner, wondering why you're troubleshooting production issues during your Elden Ring session.

Content Ijust wanted to add to this discussion that I am just compiling on VS and GCC, and used to use include guards. I have now switched to pragma once, and the only reason for me is not 199 performance or portability or standard as I don't really care what is standard as long as VS and GCC support it, and that is that: pragma once reduces possibilities for bugs. It is all too easy to copy and paste a header file to another header file, modify it to suit ones needs, and forget to change the name of the include guard. Once both are included, it takes you a while to track down the error, as the error messages arent necessarily clear. Share Follow edited Nov 30, 2014 at 9:57 answered Jul 22, 2011 at 16:55 Cookie 11.7k 13 52 81 5 This is the correct reason. Forget performance--we should use pragma once because it's less error prone. It occurs to me that if compilers are already tracking include guards, they're already doing most of the work necessary to issue warnings when they see different files using the same macro name. - rieux Jun 13, 2019 at 6:36 Add a comment pragma once has unfixable bugs. It should never be used. 169 If your include search path is sufficiently complicated, the compiler may be unable to tell the difference between two headers with the same basename (e.g. afoo.h and bfoo.h), so a pragma once in one of them will suppress both. It may also be unable to tell that two different relative includes (e.g. include "foo.h" and include "..afoo.h" refer to the same file, so pragma once will fail to suppress a redundant include when it should have. lanc arca attocic tho commorc amia