Vibecoding Is The Future

When the network security team takes "firewall" a bit too literally! This is what happens when you ask the new intern to implement a solution for tailgating (when unauthorized people follow authorized personnel through security doors). Instead of a policy solution, they've deployed a wall of actual fire to prevent physical intrusion. Talk about extreme perimeter security! The sysadmin probably said "make sure nobody gets through" and well... mission accomplished. Zero false negatives with this implementation.

Billionaire discovers basic database concepts, immediately becomes expert. Classic tech CEO move! Someone should tell him government systems are probably running on COBOL from the 70s with punch cards as backup. The irony of a rocket scientist who doesn't grasp primary keys is just *chef's kiss*. Next week: Elon discovers that computers use electricity and declares it a conspiracy.

Ah, the classic "guess the number or lose your operating system" game! This Python script starts innocently enough - importing random and os modules, generating a random number between 1 and 10, and asking for your guess. But the stakes are ASTRONOMICAL. If you guess correctly: "You Won!" Congrats on your basic pattern recognition skills! If you guess wrong: The script casually executes os.remove("C:\Windows\System32") - essentially nuking the critical directory that keeps your Windows system functioning. Game over... literally. Your computer is now an expensive paperweight. The title "Everyone should play this game 2-3 times in life" is the chef's kiss of sarcasm. Sure, if you enjoy reinstalling your OS as a hobby!

When you code based on "vibes" instead of best practices, your app security ends up looking like Swiss cheese. Full of holes. Vulnerable to attack. But hey, at least it compiled on the first try, right? The number of security vulnerabilities is directly proportional to how many times you said "this feels right" while coding.

Oh look, another Rust evangelist has cornered you at the water cooler. The number "18464028364921" isn't random—it's approximately how many times you've heard someone preach about Rust's memory safety while you're just trying to write your C++ in peace. That gun-to-head feeling is the exact sensation when someone starts their fifth lecture about how Rust prevents null pointer dereferences while you're mentally calculating how much time you've wasted listening instead of shipping code. Sure, memory safety is nice, but so is being left alone with your segmentation faults and pointer arithmetic.

The real crime scene here is declaring a variable that can be both boolean AND null. This is the kind of code that keeps security professionals awake at night. Some developer thought "hey, why use proper authentication when I can create this beautiful three-state monstrosity?" Triple equals won't save you from the existential crisis this code will cause during code review. This is the programming equivalent of leaving your front door unlocked but also maybe removing it entirely.