My Clients Don't Code

The Linux paradox in four frames! First, the enthusiastic pitch: "Use Linux!" Next, the enticing selling point: "You can configure everything!" But then comes the brutal reality check—twice for emphasis: "You have to configure everything." It's that moment when you realize your freedom to tweak every system parameter is simultaneously your prison sentence. Sure, you've escaped Windows updates, but now you're spending three hours configuring your wireless drivers and questioning your life choices. The facial expressions perfectly track the journey from Linux evangelism to the thousand-yard stare of someone who just compiled their kernel for the fifth time this week.

Content Mobile CSS ProdrammerHumor.io Desktop CSS

Content Project Project Manager Senior Developer Junior Developer

A lone dog stares contemplatively at the vast landscape, mourning the death of SMTP Basic Auth. The meme perfectly captures that special moment when tech giants decide your perfectly functional legacy system should die because "security." Meanwhile, thousands of IT admins worldwide are frantically updating ancient email scripts before everything breaks. But hey, progress, right? For the uninitiated, SMTP Basic Auth is that simple username/password authentication that's been reliably sending emails since the dawn of time. Now it's being put down like Old Yeller while modern OAuth solutions stand by, ready to introduce sixteen new points of failure.

The eternal battle continues! First person states the obvious: "JavaScript is not Java. They are different languages." But the reply below absolutely murders with precision: "Java is to JavaScript as Car is to Carpet." That analogy is devastatingly accurate. Despite sharing part of their name, these languages have about as much in common as a vehicle and floor covering. The naming confusion has been trolling newbie developers since 1995 when Netscape thought "hey, Java's hot right now, let's name our scripting language to sound similar for marketing!" 6412 upvotes for stating the obvious vs 1301 for the perfect analogy? The real bug is in the voting algorithm.

The difference between how versioning should work and how it actually works in some codebases. According to semantic versioning, you increment the major version (like 1.0 to 2.0) when you make changes that break backward compatibility. But then there's that one developer who breaks something with literally every commit and somehow still has a job. Their changelog probably just reads "Fixed stuff, broke other stuff" for every release. It's basically the software development equivalent of playing Russian roulette with a fully loaded gun.