Junior Programmer Removes Unnecessary Code

Content Tom Scott tomscott Working on code for a new project. 20:20 What I should do: learn the new state-of-the-art, figure out how to run this as a "serverless" system in The Cloud. What I'm actually doing: fixing up decade-old PHP code, because it works, I trust it, and I know how to fix it if it breaks. 97

The first comment: "When I do git blame, it's not about finding the person who did the mistake. I want to find out when the code was added, which task it was related to, and if I need more details, the person who wrote the code." The reply: "I use git blame just to make sure it wasn't me before I go on a tirade..." Ah yes, the two types of developers. The professional who uses tools for their intended purpose, and the rest of us who just want plausible deniability before ranting in Slack. Nothing quite like that moment of relief when you discover someone else wrote that abomination, followed by the crushing realization it was actually you from three years ago.

Content Random guy on stackoverflow Me having issues with my code Solution

The meme starts with a fake news headline about Silicon Valley's favorite mattress company "Eight Sleep" having a backdoor that lets engineers SSH into beds. Then it delivers the punchline with the classic "we are not the same" format. For the uninitiated, SSH is a secure protocol used by developers to remotely access systems, while a "backdoor" is a security vulnerability (often intentional) that bypasses normal authentication. So this guy isn't smooth-talking his way into someone's bedroom—he's literally using command line access to break in. It's basically the difference between having game and having admin privileges. One requires social skills, the other just needs the right credentials. Hackers: 1, Pickup artists: 0.

The eternal battle of complexity vs. simplicity in web development! On the left, we've got a modern "state-of-the-art" Next.js app with all its fancy LLMS assistance—probably 200MB of node_modules and 17 different build steps just to show "Hello World." Meanwhile, on the right, that dusty Perl CGI script from the 90s is still chugging along on some forgotten server, handling thousands of requests without breaking a sweat. Sure, the code might look like someone headbutted a keyboard, but it WORKS. And that's the punchline—both ultimately do the same thing, despite one being wrapped in layers of modern complexity. The old guard didn't have Stack Overflow or AI assistants—they had coffee, determination, and a manual. Built different indeed.

The unspoken rule of men's room etiquette is apparently nothing compared to a Python evangelist's urge to convert you. Ten years in the industry and I've never met a Python dev who can resist the opportunity to corner someone at a urinal and preach about their language of choice. Meanwhile, the rest of us just want to pee in peace without hearing about how "it's so readable" and "look how few lines of code you need." Trust me, the only whitespace I'm concerned about in this moment is the one between me and the next urinal.