Slapping On A .Expect Is Also Error Handling!

Ah, memory management... where C++ developers play Russian roulette with pointers while Rust programmers smugly watch from behind their compiler-enforced safety barriers. The "change my mind" format perfectly captures that stubborn C++ veteran who's spent 20 years mastering the dark arts of manual memory management and would rather die on that hill than admit Rust might have actually solved some problems. "I don't need safety features, I need SPEED!" they cry, while frantically debugging their 17th segmentation fault of the day.

Let's face it—no matter which programming language is your "baby," you're still a card-carrying member of Nerdville. Population: you and everyone else reading this. The only exception? MATLAB users who get the prestigious title of "engineer AND nerd." That extra badge doesn't make your code run any faster though, just means you paid more for your license. And poor FORTRAN devs are just "old and nerd"—like that vintage Star Wars t-shirt you refuse to throw away despite the holes. Still compiling on that machine from 1995, aren't you?

THE ABSOLUTE AUDACITY of web developers passionately debating C++ vs Rust while having ZERO experience with either! 😱 It's like watching someone argue about the best way to perform brain surgery after watching a 5-minute YouTube tutorial. "Well ACTUALLY, Rust's memory safety is superior" says the person whose entire coding experience is copying jQuery snippets from Stack Overflow. The philosophical debate rages on while their actual React app is still using 47 dependencies to center a div. Pure. Comedic. GENIUS.

C developers clutching their precious malloc() and free() functions like they're the last chocolate chip cookies on earth! 😱 Meanwhile, Rust is over here with its memory safety guarantees, and C devs are LOSING THEIR MINDS! "What do you MEAN I can't cause undefined behavior and segfaults anymore?! How will I express my ARTISTIC FREEDOM through dangling pointers?!" The sheer AUDACITY of Rust forcing developers to write code that doesn't randomly explode in production! THE HORROR!

The C++ Olympic gold medalist celebrates victory in the first 5 panels, only to get absolutely destroyed by Rust in the final frame. Classic story of our industry - spend decades mastering pointer arithmetic and manual memory management, then some new language comes along with a borrow checker and suddenly you're obsolete. C++17 promised better memory safety features, but let's be honest - it's like putting a band-aid on a chainsaw wound. Meanwhile Rust sits on the podium smugly preventing segfaults at compile time while every other garbage-collected language watches from second place. Ten years of debugging dangling pointers and suddenly I'm supposed to learn ownership semantics? Fine, I'll update my resume.

MY ENTIRE PROGRAMMING LIFE HAS BEEN A LIE! 😱 Here I am thinking Rust is named after that horrifying orange corrosion that eats metal alive, with its edgy "memory safety" branding, but NOOOO—it's named after some obscure fungus?! And Python?! I spent YEARS believing it was named after those terrifying reptiles that squeeze the life out of their prey (just like Python code squeezes the life out of my CPU), but it's actually named after Monty Python?! The comedy group?! What's next? Is JavaScript actually named after someone's pet goldfish named "Java" who liked to follow "scripts" of swimming patterns?! I CAN'T EVEN TRUST PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE NAMES ANYMORE! 💀