GitLab is getting kinda aggressive with marketing their new logo

Content ays since last timezone issue

Content HAVING TO GO TO DEMEANING INTERVIEWS WITH 75 STAGES FAKE RECRUITERS FOR SHITTY SCAM COMPANIES FORCED TO USE LANGUAGES AND IDES THAT MAKE YOU SICK ALWAYS ON CALL, HAVE TO ATTEND STUPID USELESS MEETINGS CS GRADUATES FORCED TO DOXK YOUR FACE AND NAME ON COMPANY WEBSITE FOR LITERALLY NO REASON Ingflip.com FORCED TO HAVE GITHUB SO LAZY RECRUITERS CAN SEE THAT YOU HAVE BEEN A BUSY LITTLE CODE MONKEY BY YOUR GREEN SQUARES HAVING TO DEAL WITH SHIT TERMS LIKE "DEV COST" OR WHATEVER IT'S CALLED WHEN YOU HAVE TO SHIT OUT UNOPTIMIZED CODE AS FAST AS YOU CAN UNTIL YOU HATE YOURSELF FORCED TO MAKE SOCIAL MEDIA LIKE LINKEDIN AND GITHUB SO LAZY RECRUITERS HAVE TO DO O EFFORT

Content Get up! Client wants more JAVASCRIPT Please, let me die.

Ah, the moment you find that promising GitHub project with 5k stars, only to discover you need to compile it from source. Suddenly your enthusiasm evaporates faster than RAM in a Chrome tab. The classic developer dilemma: is this cool tool worth the 45 minutes of dependency hell, or should you just keep using your janky workaround that "mostly works"? Nine times out of ten, that project stays uncompiled, forever living in the graveyard of "cool things I'll try someday."

Content GOOGLE AMAZON CLOUD Musk Delayed Paying Twitter's Amazon Cloud Bill, Sparking Ad Threat By Erin Woo March 3, 2023 4:06 PM PST Photo: Elon Musk. Photo by Getty. Elon Musk is running into an obstacle in his relentless drive to cut costs at Twitter: some of the same vendors that Twitter is squeezing to save money are also its advertising clients. As recently as last month, Twitter sales and marketing staff were told by their colleagues that Amazon had threatened to withhold payment for advertising it runs on Twitter because the social network for months refused to pay its Amazon Web Services bills for cloud computing services, according to two people familiar with the discussions. ProarammerHumor.io

The great IPv6 conspiracy finally exposed! After decades of network engineers forcing us to memorize hexadecimal nightmares like 2001:500:2f::f , someone's finally calling out this madness. Remember when IP addresses were just four simple numbers? Then these networking folks decided "let's add letters and colons because clearly that's more user-friendly!" Meanwhile, NAT was sitting there the whole time, perfectly capable of solving our address shortage without making us type hieroglyphics. The diagrams at the bottom really sell it - complex network schematics that might as well be ancient runes to most of us. Twenty years of "IPv6 is the future" and we're all still running IPv4 with NAT because, surprise, it actually works. And yes, there's no IPv5. It was experimental, never deployed, and now exists only in networking folklore - like documentation that's actually helpful.