I Can Do Whatever I Want

Oh. My. GOD. The absolute BETRAYAL of finding a note from past-you telling present-you to fix something "at your earliest convenience" like past-you was some kind of RESPONSIBLE ADULT?! 😱 The AUDACITY of your former self to delegate tasks to future-you while having NO IDEA what kind of hellscape future-you would be living in! And then having the NERVE to sign it like you're two different people?! Past-you is ALWAYS leaving landmines of unfinished work that present-you has to deal with. The cycle of self-sabotage continues until we're all just screaming into the void of our own technical debt! Somewhere, a git blame command is just waiting to expose your shame!

The unholy trinity of "rapid development" is on full display! The tweet claims Git, JavaScript, and Microsoft BASIC were all created in under a week—which is hilariously wrong and the perfect setup for the three-headed dragon meme below. Two fierce dragon heads represent Git and BASIC—powerful tools that required significant development time. But that third head? JavaScript with its derpy eyes and tongue sticking out perfectly captures how JS was indeed cobbled together in 10 days by Brendan Eich in 1995. Fun fact: Linus Torvalds spent months creating Git after the BitKeeper controversy, and BASIC took significant development at Microsoft. Meanwhile, JavaScript—despite being slapped together in a mad rush to compete with Java—somehow powers most of the modern web. Proof that sometimes the derpy dragon wins!

The D&D alignment chart for Git branch naming conventions is painfully accurate. Your team's choice reveals everything about your codebase's true nature. Calling it "main" means you follow best practices and probably have documentation. "Stable" folks are pragmatic but boring. Meanwhile, "rolling" users are one failed test away from disaster but somehow it always works. The chaotic evil "mommy" branch? That's the team that also has a "daddy" branch for hotfixes and wonders why HR keeps calling them.

Ah yes, the classic "my code is a complete dumpster fire but somehow works" versus "look professional for the commit" duality. Left side: messy cat representing the horrifying hacks and duct-tape solutions that miraculously make your code function. Right side: same cat in a tuxedo because suddenly we're all "clean code advocates" when it's time to push to the repo. As if adding comments and proper indentation at the last minute will hide the fact that your algorithm has the architectural integrity of a house of cards in a hurricane. Your team lead will never know!

The absolute DARK ARTISTRY of software releases! Top image: developer frantically dancing around with an empty "What's New in This Version?" box because WHO HAS TIME to document changes when there are 47 espressos in your system?! Bottom image: the universal developer cop-out - "Misc fixes and improvements" - the magical phrase that could mean ANYTHING from "we fixed that one pixel that was 0.002mm off center" to "we completely rewrote the entire codebase but don't want to admit it." Product managers HATE this one simple trick! The perfect crime that absolutely no one can question because what are they gonna do? READ THE CODE?!

That moment when your code review turns into an interrogation session. "I see you've implemented this feature without documentation... interesting . Now, before I approve your PR, tell me what you thought about that React conference keynote? Didn't catch it? What a shame. Looks like this merge might take a while..." The dark side of open source maintainers that GitHub doesn't want you to see.