Average Open Source Enjoyer

Nothing says "I'm here to help" like a junior dev submitting a PR that rewrites half the codebase before their first cup of office coffee. The message "init cursor" is the digital equivalent of "I fixed it" while the server room is on fire. Those 8,214 new files? Just dependency hell with a bow on top. Senior devs are already updating their resumes.

That moment when you realize his "private" repos are just abandoned side projects and half-baked ideas with commit messages like "fix stuff" and "it works now???" Showing someone your private GitHub repos is the developer equivalent of letting them see your search history—equal parts terrifying and disappointing. Those repos are where good ideas go to die and where code standards don't apply. It's not scandalous, just sad.

Why bother with classic SQL injection when you can just name your branch '; DROP TABLE users; -- and watch the CI/CD pipeline implode? Security teams hate this one weird trick. It's like finding a backdoor to the backdoor. Advanced hackers have moved beyond databases—they're targeting your version control system with the digital equivalent of naming your Wi-Fi "FBI Surveillance Van #7".

BEHOLD! The sacred rite of passage has been bestowed upon this poor, innocent soul! Getting your first merge conflict is like being initiated into a secret society where the membership fee is your sanity and several hours of your life you'll NEVER get back. The frog in formal attire announcing this catastrophic achievement with such pomp and circumstance is SENDING ME. Like honey, that's not an accomplishment, that's your villain origin story. Next up: accidentally pushing to production on a Friday afternoon and watching your entire team collectively have a meltdown. Welcome to the thunderdome of version control, sweetie! 💀

Remember when code reviews meant finding your coworker's spaghetti logic and passive-aggressive variable names? Now it's just you, questioning your existence while scrutinizing AI-generated code that's somehow both flawless and completely nonsensical. The modern code reviewer: frantically Googling obscure algorithms at 2 AM because you can't tell if GitHub Copilot is brilliant or hallucinating. "Is this O(log n) solution actually genius or am I being gaslit by a language model that learned to code from Stack Overflow?" Nothing grinds your gears quite like spending your precious human life debugging code written by a machine that doesn't even get tired or need coffee breaks.

When Google thinks you're having an existential crisis, but you're just trying to fix your codebase! Merge conflicts—where Git basically says "I have no idea which version of this code to keep, YOU figure it out." Those dreaded red and green highlights that make you question your career choices. Google's algorithm has clearly been trained on developer tears, immediately offering the suicide prevention hotline as if to say, "We know what resolving merge conflicts does to a person's mental state." The psychological stages of a merge conflict: denial, anger, bargaining with git, depression, and finally just force-pushing to main when nobody's looking.