Buying Games > Playing Games

Nothing turns a peaceful gamer into a keyboard-smashing rage monster faster than 500ms of network latency. You're just calmly playing your game when suddenly your character starts teleporting around like they've discovered quantum physics, and then—BAM—you're dead because your perfectly timed headshot registered somewhere in the digital void between your PC and the server. The controller that was in your hand? Now mysteriously embedded in your drywall. Not because video games cause violence... but because that &%$#@ lag definitely does.

Computer scientists: "Let's discuss if this system can solve any computable problem!" Me, a practical developer: "Cool theory bro, but can it run Doom?" The "Can it run Doom?" test has become the unofficial benchmark for computing devices since the 90s. Forget your fancy theoretical computer science - if your toaster, calculator, or pregnancy test can run a demon-slaying game from 1993, that's when you've truly made it in tech.

Developers and Steam sales - a tale as old as time. Your brain stays completely offline when seeing a $29.99 price tag, but throw in that "-50%" label and suddenly your dopamine receptors light up like a Christmas tree. The game still costs exactly $29.99, but now your primitive developer brain is convinced it's an incredible deal. And Lord Gaben watches from above, knowing you'll buy 17 games you'll never install.

Ah yes, the infamous "exposure bucks" negotiation tactic. Nothing says "I'm a big deal" quite like flaunting your 200 YouTube subscribers and threatening a bad review if you don't get free stuff. Four days later, our protagonist evolves from entitlement to existential crisis. That reply is the digital equivalent of slowly putting on sunglasses while walking away from an explosion. Every game dev has a folder of these messages saved somewhere—right next to their collection of "can you fix my printer" family texts and "it should only take 5 minutes" client requests.

The eternal GPU wars continue! NVIDIA's fictional RTX 5000 with its fancy multi-Frame Generation stands tall and powerful like Bane, completely unimpressed by AMD users' desperate attempt to cobble together their own solution. Meanwhile, AMD fans in their hot pink bodysuits are basically saying "we have NVIDIA at home" by combining FSR and AFMF technologies. It's like watching someone duct tape a rocket to a bicycle and claim it's basically a motorcycle. The performance gap is real, but hey, at least AMD users can still afford groceries after buying their graphics card.

Ah, the classic "job interview disguised as a coding test" trap. Two full days of implementing multiple bullet firing, collision optimization, weapon modes, particle effects, high score tables, and UFOs... all for the privilege of maybe getting hired. Translation: "Please build our entire game for free while we watch and decide if we like you enough to actually pay you someday." Next time just ask candidates to fix your production bugs while they're at it. Nothing says "we value your expertise" like extracting 16 hours of unpaid labor before the first handshake.