Quick Call With Manager

OH. MY. GOD. The AUDACITY of these so-called "software engineers" with their RIDICULOUS version numbers that look like someone smashed their face on a keyboard! 🙄 We've spent DECADES perfecting semantic versioning only to discover—PLOT TWIST—nobody actually needs anything beyond v1.0! And when we wanted more features? "Just use plugins!" they said, as if that's not the digital equivalent of duct-taping features to a broken chair! And don't get me STARTED on those update prompts. "Please update to version 37.0.0.69.march2023.jaguar" — WHO NAMES THESE THINGS? A cat walking across a keyboard?! Meanwhile, we're all sitting here like obedient little puppies clicking "Yes, please install updates" while staring at loading screens that tell us ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. 22GB download for what? A slightly different shade of blue in the UI? The betrayal is ASTRONOMICAL!

That moment when your phone explodes with Vercel deployment failure notifications at midnight and you're just sitting there like a supervillain contemplating your life choices. The red lighting is PERFECT because that's exactly what your face looks like when you realize you pushed to production without testing that one tiny change that "couldn't possibly break anything." Spoiler alert: IT BROKE EVERYTHING. Now you're trapped in deployment hell with no escape, just you and your phone buzzing with the same message over and over and over. Sleep? What's that? We don't know her anymore.

Ah yes, the sacred GitHub contribution chart—where quantity trumps quality. This person has 10,306 commits in a year, which is roughly 28 commits every single day . Either they're a coding superhuman or they've discovered the ancient art of git commit -m "fix typo" && git push automation. Recruiters see green squares and immediately think "coding genius" instead of "probable bot owner." The real skill here isn't programming—it's convincing people that updating README files 10,000 times is worth half a million dollars. And they say AI is coming for our jobs...

The classic corporate security theater in action! One dev tells another to "destroy all sensitive documents" and gets a reassuring "gotcha" in response. But what does our blue-tie hero actually destroy? The unit test report! Because who needs evidence of failing tests when you can just shred the evidence? It's the digital equivalent of sweeping bugs under the rug—except the rug is a paper shredder and the bugs are now "undocumented features." Security compliance: technically achieved.

Nothing says "career advancement" quite like desperately pleading to avoid accountability. Because who needs ownership, code reviews, or the ability to sleep at night when you can just... not be responsible? The beautiful irony here is that becoming a service owner means you'd actually have to care about uptime, monitoring, and those pesky production incidents. Much better to stay in the shadows where your technical debt can compound interest-free and your spaghetti code remains someone else's problem. Pro tip: if you're begging NOT to own something, you've probably already written the exact kind of code that makes service ownership a nightmare. The circle of life continues.

THE AUDACITY! Just when you're about to push that LIFE-CHANGING commit to save humanity, GitHub's rainbow unicorn of doom appears! 🦄 There you are, frantically refreshing like it'll magically fix itself, as if the unicorn will gallop away if you click hard enough. And that "contact us if the problem persists" suggestion? PLEASE! As if we're not going to try refreshing 47 more times before even CONSIDERING that option! The unicorn might as well be saying "Have you tried turning it off and on again?" while sipping tea and judging your life choices. Meanwhile, your deadline approaches and your will to live decreases with every rainbow-colored second!