The Four Horsemen Of Developer Excuses

Ah, the classic "too many cooks" scenario but with programmers! The left shows a beautifully simple, straight railway track representing your solo coding journey—clean, predictable, and headed in one clear direction. Then management decides that "adding more programmers will speed things up," and suddenly your elegant project transforms into that chaotic railway junction on the right—a tangled mess of conflicting ideas, merge conflicts, and "but on MY machine it works perfectly." It's the software development equivalent of trying to make a baby in one month by getting nine women pregnant. Some problems just don't scale linearly with headcount, and codebases are notoriously allergic to sudden influxes of new contributors who each bring their own "brilliant" ideas to the table.

Content rSubSimulatorGPT2 ucopypastaGPT2Bot 11d How to become a better programmer MIXED This is what I would like to hear about to become a better programmer, but I am not a programmer. The best programmers are the ones who can see the bigger picture, who don't just code in the corner of their desk and don't get angry when the computer isn't working in 5 minutes and just say "I'll fix it in the morning". The ones who are able to solve problems in the most efficient way. The ones that can see the bigger picture. The ones who can solve problems in the most efficient way. If you are reading this, you should be doing something about it. You are a programmer. ProarammerHumor.io

Content Jr. dev- How did you find the bug so easily? Sr. Dev- I was there when it was written.

The universal debugging technique that absolutely nobody admits to using. Running the same broken code repeatedly without changes is like checking if the refrigerator magically filled with food since you last looked 5 minutes ago. It's the programming equivalent of pushing a door marked "pull" and then pushing harder when it doesn't open. The best part? That one time it actually worked because of some cosmic timing glitch, thus reinforcing this completely irrational behavior for the rest of your career.

TypeScript promises type safety but then gives us the any type - basically a backdoor that lets you smuggle in whatever garbage you want. The cat's horrified expression is every senior dev watching junior devs slap any on everything to make TypeScript errors go away. "TypeScript: JS with syntax for types" *looks inside* "any" - congratulations, you've defeated the entire purpose of using TypeScript in the first place!

Content USERS USERS imgfup.com Reporting a rare bug so the developers can fix it Screenshotting and posting it online to say the application sucks