The Programmer's Hierarchy Of Excuses

Content Should I copy and paste Code from ChatGPT? It doesn't work It works NO STILL NO

The four stages of training an AI model, as experienced by every data scientist who's ever lived: First panel: Innocent optimism. "Training time!" Oh, you sweet summer child. Second panel: Desperate pleading. "C'MON LEARN FASTER" while staring at that pathetic learning curve that's flatter than the Earth according to conspiracy theorists. Third panel: The error messages. Just endless red text that might as well be hieroglyphics. *SIGH* indeed. Fourth panel: Complete surrender. "3, 6, 2!!!" *shoots model* "I'LL GO GET THE NEXT ONE." Because nothing says machine learning like throwing away hours of work and starting from scratch for the fifth time today. The real joke is that we keep doing this voluntarily. For money. And sometimes fun?

The classic "Asian parent expectations" trope gets a hilarious AI twist! Dad barging in with "YOU AGI YET?" while his son defends himself with "NO DAD, I'M AN LLM" only to be dismissed with "TALK TO ME WHEN YOU AGI." For the uninitiated: LLMs (Large Language Models) like ChatGPT are impressive but limited, while AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) is the holy grail that can think/reason like humans across all domains. It's like comparing a calculator to an actual mathematician. The crushing disappointment in Dad's eyes says it all... "My neighbor's AI is already solving quantum physics and you're still just autocompleting text? Shameful!"

Ah, the classic "asking AI to do your actual job" maneuver! This tweet perfectly showcases the modern developer's workflow: 1) Hear about LLMs 2) Immediately try to outsource your data parsing tasks that you're probably paid six figures to handle. The irony is that parsing documents between formats is literally what programming languages have been doing for decades. It's like asking "Is there a car specifically designed for driving?" while sitting in a Ferrari. Pro tip: Yes, there are LLMs for this. They're called "learning regex" and "using libraries that already exist." Revolutionary concept!

Oh, the classic "elephant in the room" problem has evolved into the "elephant in the AI" problem! ChatGPT was asked to create an image with "absolutely no elephants" yet there's a massive pachyderm chilling in the corner like it's paying rent. This is the digital equivalent of a unit test that passes despite the glaring bug. The AI confidently declares "Here's the image of an empty room with absolutely no elephants in it" while the evidence trunk-slaps you in the face. It's like when your code compiles without errors but still manages to crash spectacularly in production.

Nothing quite like spending 60 hours a week coding your own obsolescence. The snake eating its tail is the perfect metaphor for us building AI tools that will eventually replace us. "Just one more automation script and I'll have more time to work on important things" – said right before automating yourself out of a job. It's like sawing off the branch you're sitting on, but with better version control.