Tech Support: The Dating App Nobody Asked For

Content What we say What we mean Horrible hack Homble hack that I didnt write Temporary workaround Homble hack that I wrote 'S broken There are bugs in your code It has a few issues There are bugs in my code Obscure Someone else's code doesn't have comments Self-documenting My code doesn't have comments That's why it's an awesome anquage It's my favorite language and it's really easy to do something in it. You're thinking in the wrong mindset It's my favorite language and it's really hard to do something in it. I can read this Perl script I wrote this Perl script I can't read this Perl script I didn't write this Perl script bad structure Someone else's code is badly organized Complex structure My code is badly organized Bug The absence of a feature I like our or scone The absence of a feature I don't like Clean solution It works and l understand it Wencedto rewrite it It works but I don't understand it emacs is better than vi It's too peaceful here, let's start a flame war vi is better than emacs It's too peaceful here, let's start a flame war IMHO yourare wrote Legacy code It works, but no one knows how AXCquit (ESCESCJC I don't know how to quit vi

Content Hays Stanford haysstanford 24 Feb Tell me you are a developer without saying 'I'm a developer." 689 17 202 1,115 Tarek Jellali 3 tarekjellali Replying to haysstanford Roses are red, Violets are blue, Unexpected token at line 42. 20:50 24 Feb 21 Twitter for Android

Content MEME CODING MemeCoding memecoder That one senior who helps you debug the code, solves all edge cases and also deploys it to cloud ! FASTER COLTAN CHASTIMA.

Ah yes, the MATH doesn't math! Half equals 50%, but somehow the other half is 90%?! This is the EXACT kind of arithmetic you'd expect from someone who spends their life hunting down missing semicolons and staring at stack traces until their eyes bleed! 💀 The joke is painfully real though - what feels like it should be an even split between writing code and fixing it turns into this horrific time-sucking vortex where debugging consumes your ENTIRE EXISTENCE. One minute you're happily typing away, the next you're three energy drinks deep at 2AM, sobbing over a typo from 7 hours ago.

The ultimate prank on a programmer's psyche! Imagine being haunted by a mysterious "STARTUP ERROR 54EDGT4" that doesn't exist in any documentation. Classic psychological warfare targeting a developer's compulsive need to fix errors. The beauty is in its simplicity—using a fake error code that looks legitimate enough to send someone down a debugging rabbit hole for weeks. It's like injecting a syntax error directly into someone's soul. The perfect crime since no amount of StackOverflow searching would ever yield results!

Content DevOps Dan scripticles Schroedinger's code: it's only a bug if someone notices it programming Alberto Casas Ortiz Albert... 29 Nov 20 V Replying to scripticles and codeFlawCo And if the client notices it, it's a feature.