Strange Standards

Content 9:37 Outlook 5G (30 Debugging software with a rubber ducky About Talk to a Duck Rubber Duck Debugging The rubber duck debugging method is as follows: 1. Beg, borrow, steal, buy, fabricate or otherwise obtain a rubber duck (bathtub variety). 2. Place rubber duck on desk and inform it you are just going to go over some code with it, if that's all right. 3. Explain to the duck what your code is supposed to do, and then go into detail and explain your code line by line. 4. At some point you will tell the duck what you are doing next and then realise that that is not in fact what you are actually doing. The duck will sit there serenely, happy in the knowledge that it has helped you on your way. Note: In a pinch a coworker might be able to substitute for the duck, however, it is often preferred to confide mistakes to the duck instead of your coworker. rubberduckdebugging.com

Content thank you microsoft, very cool Get Help Rate Us: Could you try to rephrase the question? Using different words can sometimes help. i can hear myslef Here's what I think you are asking about: Fix microphone problems. Is that correct? Yes No Yes Great, glad that fixed the problem. you did not fix anything Could you try to rephrase the question? Using different words can sometimes help. Select an option or enter your response here

The joke here is a brilliant double entendre about inheritance. The first person mentions inheriting a COBOL codebase last touched by someone's mom in the 90s (literal inheritance), while the reply points out that's not how programming inheritance works (you know, the OOP concept where Child extends Parent, not where your actual parent leaves you legacy code). Nothing says "congratulations on your new job" quite like being handed 30-year-old COBOL that nobody understands anymore. The real inheritance tax is the mental breakdown you'll have trying to figure out why everything is in ALL CAPS and what PERFORM VARYING actually does.

Content OTHER PROGRAMMERS US ME THEIR CODE from dataRow1 in formReportDataTable.Asnumerable( on dataRow1("FormI0) equals dataRow2( "ObjectIO) from resultRow in tempResult.DefaultifEmpty (drFormsCaregory) from resultRow? in tempResult2.DefaultIfEmpty0 join CategoryAow in deCategories-AsEnunerable. on (Guid) resultRow"CategoryID" equals (Guid)CategoryRow(IO) into tempResult 3 FormI0 " (dataRows a nUll I dataRon (Rornio") (dataRowd as null ll datoRowd("Formilane") MY CODE if ( 'barkl); ? THEIR QUESTIONS What is the good RMSE (root-mean-square-error) value range to justify the efficiency of multivariate linear regression model? Asked today Viewed 3 times MY QUESTIONS How do you type the upside down q? Asked today Viewed 254 times THEIR ERRORS MY ERRORS Error List entire Solution 1 Error A 2 Wamings Descriotion ( CS1002 You forgot the semicolon again. Idiot. CO168 The variable e is declared but never used CS0168 The variable e1' is declared but never used DESMAN

Ah, the classic NumPy paradox: np.nan == np.nan returns False . Because apparently even NaN doesn't want to be associated with itself. Just like that one developer who wrote this code and now refuses to acknowledge it in code reviews. The screaming title perfectly captures that moment when you spend 3 hours debugging only to discover your data analysis is failing because Not-a-Number isn't equal to... itself. It's not a bug, it's a feature – said no data scientist ever.

Reading documentation in a language you don't understand is basically the programmer's version of this French phrase book story. You confidently copy that Stack Overflow snippet, run it, and suddenly your terminal is screaming at you in 17 different error messages—none of which make any sense. The "vibe coders" line is pure gold. That's what we call devs who just throw random code at the problem until something works without understanding why. They're the ones who paste jQuery solutions into React apps and wonder why everything's on fire. Been in this industry 15 years and I'm still occasionally a vibe coder. We all are when deadline pressure hits and the client's breathing down our neck. Good luck indeed.