Not For The Faint Of Heart

Content Game-Breaking Bug Fixed The game breaking "stuck on Hey" bug has been fixed. The glitch did not allow the player to proceed past the first message of any level. The cause of this is very interesting. We tried on many machines but were unable to replicate the bug. It seemed like it was affecting players at random. After looking through the discussion posts and reviews, I started to notice a pattern. All reviews and messages sent were from people that are from places that were not North America. So the question was: what's the difference between a American computer and a non-American computer? Well when you are texting a message in the game and pause for a moment and then delete we tell the game to pause for a certain amount of time. for example 1.7 seconds. But decimal separators en wikipedia.orai are different in different countries (ex: 1.7 vs 1,7). This caused the game to either error or wait for an absurd amount of time before proceeding. In short, countries using decimal commas caused the game to break whereas countries using decimal points did not. TL;DR: The game is fixed now! Please enjoy.

The universal law of programming nobody teaches in CS degrees: "If it works, don't touch it." That moment when your janky code with 17 nested if-statements and zero comments somehow passes all tests, and you back away from the keyboard like you're defusing a bomb. The code is held together by digital duct tape and prayers, but hey—ship it! Future you can deal with that technical debt... or better yet, whoever inherits your codebase after you've conveniently switched teams.

The cat's face says it all. You spend years mastering development, only to have management add AI to your job requirements. Now you're drowning in Stack Overflow trying to figure out how to make ChatGPT produce code that doesn't look like it was written by a caffeinated monkey with a keyboard. The dog got adopted - your sanity didn't.

The classic "I'll just copy-paste from Stack Overflow" mentality in its purest form. What starts as a simple plan to save time by reusing code quickly turns into a Frankenstein's monster of mismatched parts somehow still floating. That outboard motor strapped to Bugs Bunny who's strapped to Wile E. Coyote is basically what your codebase looks like after six months of "temporary solutions." The best part? You'll still tell your PM it's "technically functional" during the demo.

Content luciferlaughs Scientists have discovered how to make glow-in-the-dark cats by inserting the jellyfish genes that create fluorescent proteins into feline eggs. IS wordswithkittywitch I needed to check that this was real, and apparently, it is. What's more, the end goal in these experiments was to fight feline AIDS, creating glow-in-the-dark cats was a side effect. That might be the greatest sentence I write this year. supersciencegeek Ok, so the short version is that scientists want to insert a Useful Gene. But they have no way of knowing if the Useful Gene actually got incorporated into the cat's (or other animal's) DNA. So they glue the Glow Gene to the Useful Gene. If the animal glows, both genes got inserted successfully.

Ah, the four-step career assassination tutorial! Nothing sends a frontend developer into existential crisis faster than watching someone test their "responsive" design by actually... *checks notes*... using different devices. The psychological warfare begins with showing off multiple devices, continues with the developer watching in horror as their beautiful creation morphs into an eldritch abomination across screens, and culminates with the coup de grâce: printing the monstrosity to immortalize their shame. Somewhere, a CSS media query is crying. Somewhere else, a Bootstrap developer is pouring another drink.