Care Less About Bugs

The universal hatred for CMake transcends all intelligence levels! The meme shows an IQ bell curve with people at every point—from 55 to 145—united in their collective trauma of writing CMakeLists.txt files at 3AM while sobbing uncontrollably. The "well ackchyually" guy at the bottom represents that one teammate who claims to understand CMake but still copy-pastes from StackOverflow like the rest of us. Nothing brings C++ developers together like the shared existential dread of finding yourself in dependency hell with zero documentation. It's the build system we all use and absolutely nobody enjoys!

The five stages of debugging: denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and finally... "No. I decided I don't care." That comment with 292 likes is the digital equivalent of throwing your laptop out the window but with more dignity. Sometimes the true solution to a bug is just declaring psychological victory and moving on. Bonus points for doing it on New Year's Eve when you should be anywhere but Stack Overflow.

Content Pranay Pathole PPathole Find bug, write fix Click 'run', bug is still there Pull hair out over why obvious solution isn't working Question career choices Realise you didn't hit 'build and run'

Content IF THE WORLD WAS CREATED BY A PROGRAMMER IN THE BEGINNING, THERE WAS THE HEAVEN AND THE EaRTH BUT THE EARTH WAS FORMLESS AND BUGGY, WITHOUT DOCUMENTATION BY toggl AND THE PROGRAMMER SAW THAT IT WAS NOT GOOD THEN YOU SAID "LET THERE BE LIGHT! BUT THE LIGHT DID NOT COMPILE. ON THE SECOND DAY. YOU MERGE WATER YOU CREATE A HACK SO THAT LIGHT IS PART THE LAND TO CREATE DARKNESS, YOU NEED TO HIDE THE LAND, BUT THat's OK CAUSE CREATURES WONT BE ADDED UNTIL LATER AND STACKOVERFLOW SAID IT'S FINE BUT BECAUSE OF THE DEPENDENCY, LIGHT BREAKS AS LAND IS ACCIDENTALL: FLOODED YOU CHECK STACKOVERFLOW (IN THE DARKNESS) IT's The thiRd DaY. TURNS OUT THE CREATURES NEEDED TO BE ADDED SOONER BUT THE CLIENT FORGOT to MENTION THAT You TRY TO ADD CREATURES YOU ADD THEM IN THE IN THE DARKNESS, BUT BROWSER USING COOKIES THERE'S NO LAND WITHOUT UNFORTUNATELY MAKES TuSM MORTAL LIGHT, AND YOU CAN'T HAVE LIGHT BECAUSE OF THE WATFO IT's THE FOURTH DAY. TURNS OUT THE ISSUES WERE CAUSED BY THE FLAT EARTH DESIGN YOU DECIDE TO USE C YOU ALSO USE STI TO CREATE A BALLOON FOR ABSTRACTIONS, AND THAT INFLATES THE EARTH IT WORKS OUT GREAT wITH NO COMPLICATIONS WHATSOEVER! IT'S THE FIFTH DaY YOU START ADDING PEOPLE TO HELP YoU. ON THE SIXTH DAY YoU LOOK AT THE CHAOS YOU CREATED DANGLING I YOU DECIDE TO CREATE THEM IN YOUR LIKENESS, WHICH IS A MISTAKE REACT THEY IMMEDIATELY POPULATE THE EARTH WITH HACKS, FADS AND UNNECESSARY JAVASCRIPT LIBRARIES JESUS. REACT FUCKIT.JS) QUERY YOU ATTEmPT TO LEAD PEOPLE BACK TO SENSIBLE PROGRAMMING BUT IT IS TOO LATE - EVERYTHING RUNS ON DEPENDENCIES. DAYTIMEAIR.JS SEA.JS REALISTIC.WAVES. JS gETTERBANKS.J BASE. JS GIRAFFE.JS ON ThE SEVENTH DAY You realLy want to REST, BUT YOU NEED oRGanISe aLL You've CreaTeD MONGODB TOGGL.COM MaRT VIRKUS ProdrammerHumor.io

The code is a perfect example of why game developers shouldn't be allowed near RNGs unsupervised! 😂 What we're looking at is a glorious mess of Python where someone created two nearly identical functions ( count_greater_than_11 and count_greater_than_5 ) that generate random numbers between 1-20 and increment a counter when the number exceeds a threshold. But wait! The function names and comments don't even match - one says "greater than 11" in the comment but checks for > 10 in the code, while the other claims to check for > 5 but actually checks for > 4! And then there's that lonely is_divisible_by_7 function at the bottom, just hanging out with no apparent connection to anything else. It's like someone started implementing their own version of RNG bias with specific magic numbers, got bored halfway through, and shipped it anyway. This is probably why that boss battle feels unfairly difficult every 7th attempt...

The eternal CSS unit struggle claims another victim! Type "200px" for a nice, predictable border width... but hit "200em" and suddenly your eyebrows are consuming half the viewport. That's not responsive design, that's responsive disaster. The difference between "looks fine on my machine" and "summoning social services" is literally one character. And they wonder why frontend developers drink.