The Path To The Dark Side: C++ In 6 Hours

Ah, the classic "I'll mix five languages in seven lines and call it a day" approach! This monstrosity has C++ syntax with iostream and std::cout , but wrapped in Python-style def () function declaration, no parameter names, and curly braces like it's Java or C#. Then there's that mathematical abomination calculating "e" with nested exponents that would make a calculator have an existential crisis. And the cherry on top? Outputting variable x that doesn't even exist while calculating e that's never used. Whoever wrote this clearly graduated from the "chaotic evil" school of programming.

Behold the FizzBuzz solution that thinks it's a Picasso! Someone redefined all the brackets and braces with custom ASCII art, then implemented the most over-interviewed algorithm in history. It's like putting a tuxedo on a coding test everyone's seen a million times. The real art here isn't the FizzBuzz solution—it's making your code reviewer question their will to live when they have to maintain this masterpiece. Bonus points for the pretentious title "Just Art" as if this isn't the coding equivalent of wearing a fedora to a job interview.

Ah, the classic "#DEFINE MADNESS" - doing the same thing over and over while expecting different results. Twenty years in this industry and I still catch myself hammering that compile button like it's going to magically fix itself. Meanwhile, the compiler is just sitting there thinking, "This idiot is sending me the exact same broken code repeatedly. Should we tell him or just keep launching errors like a medieval catapult?" The real kicker? That one time you compile the same code without changing anything and it suddenly works. That's when you know the universe is just messing with you.

DARLING, the computer said "Tell a programmer to up VERTEX_BUFFER_SIZE" and I am LITERALLY just the messenger! 💅 What am I supposed to do? Learn C++? Sacrifice my firstborn to the GPU gods? The error message has SPOKEN, and who am I—a mere mortal user—to question its divine wisdom? The audacity of this game engine thinking I have ANY idea what a "dynamic vertex buffer" is! It might as well have asked me to explain quantum physics while juggling flaming chainsaws. I'm just trying to play my game with friends named "asbestosmuncher" and "Cock of the Block" like any normal person!

Behold, the dark arts of firmware programming. What we're seeing here is a function pointer declaration that would make C purists weep into their mechanical keyboards. It's the coding equivalent of duct-taping a rocket to a shopping cart—technically it works, but nobody's proud of it. The syntax is so convoluted that even the compiler probably needs therapy after parsing it. This is what happens when you code at 3 AM fueled by nothing but energy drinks and desperation.

Left: Game dev crying because Unity changed their pricing model and now they need a second mortgage to make a 2D platformer. Right: The bearded C++ developer who's been writing their own engine since 2003 and still hasn't released a game, but boy does that skybox rendering look crisp. It's the classic tradeoff - use a commercial engine and get destroyed by licensing fees, or build your own and get destroyed by feature creep. Either way, your game is never shipping.