Memory management Memes

Garbage Is Garbage

4 days ago 244.2K views 0 shares

The garbage collector doesn't discriminate—whether your code is written by someone who names variables "x1" and "x2" or a developer who thinks they're writing poetry with their function names, it all gets cleaned up the same way. Memory leaks don't care about your vibes. This hits different because "vibe coders" are out here writing code based on aesthetics and feelings, probably spending 20 minutes deciding between map vs forEach based on which one "feels right." Meanwhile, the garbage collector is just doing its job, treating their beautifully crafted objects the same as any other unreferenced heap allocation. No bonus points for code that sparks joy. At the end of the day, once that reference count hits zero or the mark-and-sweep algorithm runs, your elegant singleton pattern and someone's nested ternary nightmare get the same treatment: straight to the memory dump.

What Do I Need The Include Lines For

C++ Programming Debugging

6 days ago 252.1K views 0 shares

Someone just discovered the secret to writing memory-safe C code: free your memory before you allocate it. Galaxy brain move right there. The cherry on top? They included assert.h like they're about to write production-quality code with proper error handling, but then immediately went full chaos mode with free(&malloc()) . That's like putting on a seatbelt before driving off a cliff. Pro tip: Those include statements are actually the only correct part of this code. Everything after line 5 is a war crime against computing.

Also Electricity Is Optional

Linux Hardware Windows

12 days ago 233.3K views 0 shares

You installed 32GB of RAM thinking your Linux system would finally use it. Cute. Linux sits there consuming maybe 800MB at idle while the remaining 31.2GB just... exists. Meanwhile Windows would've already eaten half of it just to run the Start menu. The efficiency is almost insulting. You paid good money for that RAM and Linux refuses to acknowledge it exists. It's like buying a Ferrari and your OS insists on riding a bicycle to save gas. Sure, it's impressive, but also kind of a flex you didn't ask for. Fun fact: Linux actually uses available RAM for disk caching, but it releases it instantly when needed. So technically it IS using your RAM, just not in a way that makes you feel better about your purchasing decisions.

Guys Figure Out How Can We Store Dreams

Programming Debugging Databases Backend

13 days ago 348.8K views 0 shares

Oh, the TRAGEDY of volatile memory! Your dreams are basically that data you forgot to persist to disk before the power went out. They exist in RAM for like 2.5 seconds, feeling all important and vivid, and then *POOF* - garbage collected into the void the moment you open your eyes. Just like that variable you swore you'd save but the app crashed and took all your unsaved work with it to the shadow realm. The operating system of your brain is basically running on the world's worst database with zero redundancy and NO backup strategy whatsoever. Sweet dreams are made of volatile storage, apparently!

Looking At You Overlapping Segments

Hardware C++ Programming

17 days ago 182.1K views 0 shares

So you discover that in 16-bit real mode, the BIOS handles hardware directly and your OS doesn't need device drivers. Sweet! Freedom from driver hell, right? Then you learn about 16-bit memory segmentation and suddenly that smile disappears faster than your will to live. For the uninitiated: in real mode, memory addresses are calculated using segment:offset pairs, and because both are 16-bit values, segments can overlap in the most cursed ways possible. You can have multiple segment:offset combinations pointing to the same physical address. It's like having 5 different street addresses for the same house, except the mailman is your CPU and it's having an existential crisis. Suddenly writing device drivers doesn't seem so bad anymore. At least those make logical sense. Overlapping segments? That's just sadism with extra steps.

He Loves Cpp So Much

C++ Programming

18 days ago 243.7K views 0 shares

The compound interest of technical debt, but make it a life sentence. Missing one day of C++ practice apparently requires two hours of penance the next day, which means by tomorrow this person will be coding for three *years* straight. At this rate, they'll be debugging memory leaks in their sleep by 2027 and explaining pointer arithmetic to their grandchildren by 2030. The math checks out perfectly for someone who clearly enjoys suffering.

I Mean 64 Gigs Is 64 Gigs

Hardware Docker Programming

19 days ago 246.5K views 2 shares

The moment you realize RAM prices have gotten so ridiculous that you're genuinely considering whether Mr. Whiskers is worth more as a companion or as a down payment on that 64GB upgrade. Chrome's got 47 tabs open, Docker's eating memory like it's an all-you-can-eat buffet, and your IDE is basically running a small country's worth of processes. The cat's looking at you with those big eyes, but you're looking at him calculating his resale value in DDR5 sticks. We've all been there—well, maybe not the cat-selling part, but definitely that internal debate where you're pricing out RAM upgrades versus literally anything else in your life. Priorities, right?

Easy Explanation Of Pointers

C++ Programming

20 days ago 216.9K views 0 shares

So you start with a regular int and everyone's cool. Then you add one asterisk to make it int* and people get a little excited but still following along. Add another asterisk for int** and now we're pointing to a pointer and things are getting spicy. But void* ? That's where your soul leaves your body. It's a pointer to... something. Could be anything. Could be nothing. The compiler has given up on type safety and so have you. It's the programming equivalent of "trust me bro" and the reason why C programmers have that thousand-yard stare. Fun fact: void* is basically how malloc tells you "here's some memory, figure it out yourself" which is both terrifying and liberating.

Find Your Place

Programming Hardware Csharp C++ Java

24 days ago 374.5K views 3 shares

The hard truth that keeps memory-conscious developers up at night. A boolean only needs 1 bit to represent true or false, but because most systems can't address individual bits, it gets allocated a whole byte. That's 87.5% storage efficiency loss, which is basically the computing equivalent of buying a mansion to store a single shoe. Some languages try to optimize this with bit fields or packed structures, but let's be real—most of the time we're just casually wasting 7 bits per boolean like we're made of RAM. Which, to be fair, we kind of are these days. Storage is cheap, existential dread about inefficiency is free. The real tragedy? Those 7 bits could've been living their best life storing actual data, but instead they're just... there. Unemployed. Collecting dust. A monument to the gap between theoretical computer science and practical implementation.

Simpler Times Back Then

Hardware Gamedev Javascript Programming

25 days ago 288.7K views 0 shares

Modern devs out here with 16GB of RAM, gaming PCs that could render the entire universe, PS5s, and somehow still manage to make Electron apps that eat memory like it's an all-you-can-eat buffet. Meanwhile, legends back in the day were crafting entire operating systems and games on 2MB of RAM with hardware that had less computing power than today's smart toaster. The contrast is brutal: we've got 8,000x more RAM and yet Chrome tabs still bring our machines to their knees. Those old-school devs were writing assembly, optimizing every single byte, and shipping masterpieces on a PlayStation 1 and Super Nintendo. They didn't have Stack Overflow, npm packages, or the luxury of importing 500MB of node_modules to display "Hello World." The SpongeBob meme format captures it perfectly: modern devs looking sophisticated with all their fancy hardware versus the raw, unhinged genius of developers who had to make magic happen with constraints that would make today's engineers weep. Respect to those who coded when memory management wasn't optional—it was survival.

C's Sadness

Debugging C++ Programming

26 days ago 312.0K views 0 shares

You know that special feeling when you're walking through your C codebase and suddenly realize you've been trampling all over memory you shouldn't have touched? Yeah, that's the one. Stepping in undefined behavior is like stepping in dog crap – you don't always notice it immediately, but once you do, the smell follows you everywhere. The worst part? You can't just wipe it off. Now you're debugging CSIDESCISSING HARD DATA CLAIMS, which is basically C's way of saying "congratulations, you've corrupted memory so badly that even your error messages are having a stroke." Segfaults, corrupted stacks, random crashes three functions away from where you actually screwed up – welcome to manual memory management, where the compiler trusts you completely and you absolutely should not be trusted.

Clever Girl

Hardware C++ Programming Linux Backend

26 days ago 254.7K views 0 shares

When you create virtual memory to abstract away physical memory fragmentation, but then realize that abstraction just made memory lookups slower, so you add a TLB (Translation Lookaside Buffer) to cache the address translations. It's basically putting a band-aid on your band-aid. The medieval peasant calling out the circular logic is *chef's kiss* because yeah, you created a problem and then "solved" it by adding more complexity. This is systems programming in a nutshell—every solution spawns a new problem that requires another clever workaround. Twenty years in and I'm still not sure if we're geniuses or just really good at justifying our own mess.

Browse