Please Use Static Analysis On Your C++ Codebase

Regular developers measure performance in milliseconds or microseconds because that's what modern tools show them. Meanwhile, the true optimization psychopaths are counting individual CPU clock cycles like it's 1982. They're the ones rewriting entire functions in assembly just to save 3 cycles in a loop that runs twice a day. The difference between "fast enough" and "I need to know exactly how many nanoseconds each instruction takes."

Sure, your C++ code runs 100x faster... after you spent 100x longer writing it. That caveman dragging the scientist around is the perfect metaphor for C++ performance vs Python simplicity. Your friend's busy managing memory and fighting segfaults while you're sipping coffee after a casual import numpy . The torch might be impressive, but I'll take my 10 lines of readable code over your flaming monstrosity any day.

In English, the letters 'i' and 'j' are just skinny little characters that barely make an impact. But in programming? Those loop counters bench press your entire codebase. Nothing quite like watching your nested for loops with i,j variables crush through 10,000 iterations without breaking a sweat. Those humble little variables carry the weight of algorithms that would make mere mortals collapse. Seven years into my career and I'm still naming my loop counters i,j,k like it's some sacred tradition passed down from the elders of computer science.

The duality of programmer brain function is hilariously accurate here. For regular variables, it's absolute chaos - fighting over whether to use temp , result , or just mash the keyboard with myVar . But for iteration variables? The council has convened and unanimously decreed: "We shall use 'i' and nothing else." The formal ceremony of loop counter naming has remained unchanged since the ancient days of FORTRAN. Bonus points if you graduate to j for nested loops while feeling incredibly sophisticated.

The classic tale of preprocessor pain! Our poor green frog friend discovers the horrors of working with a client who doesn't understand the critical difference between #pragma once and #ifndef header guards. The dev goes through the proper steps: asking about header guard preferences, explaining duplication errors with a detailed diagram (like the absolute C++ nerd they are), only to discover the client was clueless the whole time. The punchline? "It's pragma once" - meaning the client picked a solution without understanding the problem. This is the programming equivalent of explaining quantum physics to someone who then says "atoms are small, got it!"

Regular Pooh: Writing out a full if-else block like some kind of verbose peasant. Tuxedo Pooh: Using the ternary operator like the sophisticated one-liner aristocrat you are. Why waste time write lot code when few code do trick?