Learn C++ In One Video (If You Have 24 Days To Spare)

When your kid wants Scratch (the beginner-friendly block programming language) but you're a C programmer with trust issues and a weird sense of humor. This madlad literally redefined curly braces and brackets with ASCII art, then implemented FizzBuzz with them. It's the programming equivalent of making a sandwich with a chainsaw because "it gets the job done." The worst part? It probably compiles. That's the real horror story here.

The sacred covenant of loop variables! Since the dawn of computer science, the variables 'i', 'j', and 'k' have been the chosen ones for iteration. Questioning this tradition is like asking why water is wet. It's not just convention—it's hardwired into programmer DNA at this point. Try using 'foo' or 'counter' in your loops and watch your colleagues break out in hives. The compiler probably judges you silently too. Some say Dijkstra himself decreed this naming convention, and we dare not anger the algorithm gods.

OH. MY. GOD. The absolute AUDACITY of this developer flexing their programming superiority with custom license plates! "NLLPTR" and "XCPTN" - aka "null pointer" and "exception" - the twin horsemen of the coding apocalypse! 💀 This is like tattooing your two worst nightmares on your forehead and then DRIVING AROUND with them! Imagine being so traumatized by debugging that you spend actual MONEY to immortalize your pain on your car. Peak programmer masochism right here!

Even ancient philosophers can't escape syntax errors! Poor guy is sitting there contemplating the universe when his real problem is just a typo. He declared "ovid" instead of "void" and now his existential crisis is actually just a compiler error. The statue's deep contemplative pose really sells it - like he's been debugging for 2000 years and still hasn't spotted the missing 'v'. Classical debugging at its finest!

HOW DARE YOU QUESTION THE SACRED TRADITION OF i,j VARIABLES?! The AUDACITY! Since the dawn of coding time, we've used i and j for loop counters like it was handed down from the programming gods themselves. Try using 'x' or 'counter' in your loops and watch as senior devs spontaneously combust at their desks. It's not just convention—it's PROGRAMMING LAW, and we will defend it with the same intensity as tabs vs. spaces or where to put curly braces. Don't even THINK about using meaningful variable names in your loops—that's heresy of the highest order!

OH. MY. GOD. Someone actually wrote a function that checks if a deck is unique by comparing it to previous decks, loops through ALL 52 CARDS, and then... PLOT TWIST... returns true no matter what! 🤦‍♀️ The drama here is ASTRONOMICAL! That entire red section is just elaborate theater that does ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. It's like building an entire security system for your house but leaving the key under the mat with a neon sign saying "KEY HERE!" The function name promises uniqueness but delivers LIES. Trust issues? I have them now.