I Am Speed (But At What Cost)

The evolution of programming weapons, perfectly illustrated. Assembler is your basic knife with a scope—minimal but precise. C is just a bullet with a hammer, because who needs safety features? C++ straps five different weapons together with duct tape and calls it "object-oriented." And then there's Python, which looks like it was designed by a committee of drunk engineers who couldn't decide what they wanted, so they included everything. "Yes, it's inefficient and ridiculous looking, but look how fast I can deploy it!"

The classic "wanna see spaghetti?" pickup line, but make it programming! Nothing says "I'm a coding disaster" quite like offering to show someone your assembler, BASIC, old C code, or COBOL. It's the digital equivalent of opening your closet and having all the skeletons fall out at once. The real horror isn't in haunted houses—it's in legacy codebases written by developers who left the company 15 years ago with zero documentation.

Ah, the pinnacle of dating advice from the C++ trenches! When asked what makes someone instantly attractive, our hero bypasses all the superficial stuff and goes straight for the jugular: fluency in C++ . Because nothing says "date me" like understanding memory management, pointer arithmetic, and template metaprogramming. The 177 upvotes clearly indicate this person has found their target audience - other developers who've spent countless nights debugging segmentation faults instead of developing social skills. The perfect pickup line doesn't exi—oh wait, it's "I can implement a non-recursive quicksort without Stack Overflow."

This function is the CS equivalent of taking a sledgehammer to crack a nut. Base cases? Check. Recursion? Check. Unnecessarily complex ternary operator? Triple check! The function handles 0 and 1 as base cases (0 is even, 1 is odd), but then goes completely off the rails with a recursive call that either subtracts OR adds 2 depending on whether n is positive. It's like writing a novel when "return n % 2 == 0" would do the job in one line. The real cherry on top? This function will eventually reach a base case for any integer input, but at what cost? Your CPU fans are already spinning up in anticipation of the stack overflow.

The language wars are getting brutal! C# thinks adding a number to a string makes "a1" because it's doing string concatenation. Python's like "that's not valid syntax, you fool!" Meanwhile, C is just sitting there with its empty string result because it's adding the ASCII value of 'a' (97) to 1, getting 98 (which is 'b'), but then comparing it to an empty string, which is... definitely not what anyone wanted. This is why we can't have nice things in cross-language teams.

The embedded systems world is having a full-blown affair with C/C++ while giving Rust the cold shoulder. Despite Rust's memory safety guarantees and zero-cost abstractions, embedded devs keep crawling back to their toxic exes C and C++. It's like watching someone choose dial-up when fiber is available because "we've always done it this way." The embedded community's relationship status with C/C++ is definitely: "It's complicated" – and by complicated, I mean "refusing to move on despite all the segfaults and buffer overflows."