Watch Me Cry When I Cannot Solve The Next One

That hollow feeling when you watch an AI model execute your former coding responsibilities with cold, algorithmic precision. There you sit, equal parts impressed and devastated, as your precious hand-crafted algorithms—once your pride and joy—are now just another task for the silicon overlord. The machine doesn't even have the decency to struggle with that tricky edge case that kept you up for three nights. Relationship status with your code: It's complicated.

This is basically the "Fox, Chicken, and Grain" logic puzzle repackaged as the ultimate management nightmare. Except instead of preventing your chicken from being eaten, you're preventing your team from murdering each other. The solution? Move the bore first, then the idiot, then bring the bore back, then move the asshole, and finally move the bore again. Though the real power move would be to just quit and find a company with functioning HR. And they say technical interviews are unrealistic...

The duality of coding in its purest form. Left side: a beginner writing a nested loop monstrosity with 12 lines to print a simple pattern. Right side: the professional with the thousand-yard stare of someone who's seen too many code reviews, just hardcoding five print statements and calling it a day. The beginner thinks they're being clever with their algorithm. The professional knows the true path to enlightenment: whatever ships fastest with the least maintenance. Why waste time writing elegant loops when you can just... not? It's the coding equivalent of using a jackhammer to hang a picture frame versus just using a nail and your shoe.

The ultimate solution to all your sorting woes: just nuke the entire array! This brilliant NPM package demonstrates the pinnacle of JavaScript efficiency—remove all elements and return an empty array. Problem solved in O(1) time! Notice how it returns [] regardless of input? That's not a bug, it's a feature! Why waste CPU cycles on complex algorithms when you can just obliterate your data entirely? The package has zero dependencies because, like any good weapon of mass destruction, it's completely self-contained. The misattributed Oppenheimer quote really sells it. Next time your tech lead asks why the data disappeared, just whisper dramatically: "I am become Death, destroyer of unsorted arrays."

Ah, the classic variable naming progression of a developer slowly losing their mind! Started with a reasonable user , then users for a collection, and then... complete descent into nested list madness. By the time we hit userssssssss with 8 levels of nesting, we're basically writing code that future-you will need therapy to debug. The number of brackets at the end is practically a bracket avalanche waiting to crash your syntax highlighter. This is what happens when you code at 1% battery with no variable naming convention document in sight.

When your neural network confidently labels a cat as a dog, but everyone's freaking out about the AI apocalypse. Look, I've been training models for 15 years, and I can assure you the biggest threat isn't Skynet—it's that production code written at 3 AM with no code review. The real uprising will start when my model can correctly identify my cat and remember to order cat food when I'm running low. Until then, we're safe from the robot overlords... probably.