What Could Go Wrong

When your resume says "Expert in Python, Java, and 10 other languages" but the HR algorithm only picked up "fluent in English." The team leader is all excited about your "perfectly skilled" profile while HR is just happy they found someone who can understand the company lunch menu. This is why we can't have nice things in tech recruitment. Those fancy AI-powered resume parsers that companies spend thousands on? Yeah, they're basically just CTRL+F with a business suit on. Meanwhile, qualified candidates walk right past because their resume didn't include the sacred keyword "synergy" exactly 7 times.

The chart hilariously reveals that GPT-5 scores a whopping 74.9% accuracy on software engineering benchmarks, but the pink bars tell the real story – 52.8% of that is achieved "without thinking" while only a tiny sliver comes from actual "thinking." Meanwhile, OpenAI's o3 and GPT-4o trail behind with 69.1% and 30.8% respectively, with apparently zero thinking involved. It's basically saying these AI models are just regurgitating patterns rather than performing actual reasoning. The perfect metaphor for when your code works but you have absolutely no idea why.

That score of -17 is the real cherry on top. Someone's worried AI is making Stack Overflow obsolete, but can't even formulate a proper question that meets basic standards. The irony is delicious—complaining about AI ruining the platform while demonstrating exactly why moderation exists in the first place. Maybe instead of fighting the AI revolution, spend five minutes learning how to ask a focused question? Just a thought.

Look, I've been around long enough to know that AI replacing programmers is the tech equivalent of "flying cars by 2020." But Stack Overflow? Yeah, that's actually happening. Why spend 20 minutes waiting for some moderator to mark your question as duplicate when ChatGPT will just... answer it? Wrong sometimes, sure, but at least it won't roast you for not including your environment details. Stack Overflow traffic has genuinely tanked since LLMs became mainstream. Turns out people prefer a hallucinating AI that's nice to them over a correct human who makes them feel like an idiot. Can't say I blame them.

The AUDACITY of this code! Instead of just adding two variables like a normal human being (a + b = 8, duh!), this developer is summoning the almighty ChatGPT to perform basic arithmetic! 💀 We've gone from "Let me Google that for you" to "Let me ask an AI to add 5+3" and honestly I'm having an existential crisis about the future of programming. Next thing you know, we'll be using quantum supercomputers to calculate tip percentages at restaurants! The saddest part? This is probably faster than some of my teammates' code reviews. 🙃

The great AI career pivot of 2025! While MBAs panic about ChatGPT stealing their PowerPoint jobs, developers are quietly rebranding themselves as "AI Experts" after watching two YouTube tutorials and adding a few API calls to their resume. Nothing says job security like slapping "AI" in front of your job title and charging triple your hourly rate. The best part? The MBA who demanded "AI integration" in your app can't tell the difference between actual machine learning and an if-statement with extra steps.