We Are So Close To AGI

Rookie developer shares their groundbreaking "ChatGPT-built website" by sending a localhost URL that only works on their machine. For the uninitiated, localhost:3000 is the address for a web server running on your own computer—it's completely inaccessible to anyone else. Like inviting someone to check out your amazing new house but giving them the coordinates to your imaginary dream home in Narnia. The digital equivalent of "trust me bro, it's revolutionary" followed by showing absolutely nothing.

Let's be real—AI chatbots aren't your coding buddies, they're just wolves in sheep's clothing. They slide you that suspiciously perfect code snippet and have the audacity to ask "Does this work?" like they don't already know the answer. Meanwhile, you're about to copy-paste that disaster straight into production because hey, who has time to actually test things? The real joke is that the chatbot is training you to debug its hallucinations. Next time just reply "works perfectly" and watch your server catch fire from a distance.

The AUDACITY of command line tools thinking I'd stoop so low as to type --help ! Why spend 10 measly seconds reading documentation when I can spend 5 GLORIOUS minutes crafting the perfect question for GPT? My pride simply cannot handle the thought of consulting built-in help menus like some kind of... *shudders*... EFFICIENT DEVELOPER. I'd rather die dramatically waiting for an AI response than admit I don't know every single flag option by heart. It's not stubbornness, it's a LIFESTYLE.

Ah, Google Assistant taking "seconds" literally while DeepSeek and OpenAI duke it out in the AI arena. Poor thing is just counting all the 2nds in a year instead of calculating 365 × 24 × 60 × 60. This is what happens when you train your model on dad jokes instead of math problems. At least it's consistently wrong with confidence - the hallmark of every production system I've ever maintained.

Ah, the classic "let's use a sledgehammer to kill a fly" approach. Every tech startup these days thinks they need machine learning to solve problems that could be handled with an if-statement and a cup of coffee. After 15 years in the industry, I've sat through countless pitch meetings where some bright-eyed founder explains how their revolutionary AI will disrupt the sandwich-ordering process. Meanwhile, their actual problem is that they can't figure out how to store user preferences in a database. The real kicker? When they finally implement their neural network to predict topping preferences, it works worse than random chance. But hey, at least they can put "AI-powered" in their pitch deck!

SOMEONE PLEASE REVOKE THIS MAN'S DEVELOPER LICENSE IMMEDIATELY! 🚨 This tweet is the programming equivalent of saying "a hammer is just an API to nails" and "nails are an API to wood" and "wood is an API to trees." MAKE IT STOP! An API (Application Programming Interface) is a specific set of rules and protocols that allows different software applications to communicate with each other - NOT this cosmic tech ladder to the universe! The only thing this tweet proves is that if you string enough technical words together, you can sound profound while being CATASTROPHICALLY wrong. It's giving "I just discovered programming last week and now I'm having deep thoughts" energy.