VC Interview Be Like

The great developer migration of 2023 visualized. Massive crowd flocking to ChatGPT while one lonely soul still visits Stack Overflow. Remember when we had to actually read through 15 answers, each starting with "Actually, you shouldn't do it that way" before finding a solution that worked? Now we just ask the AI and get code that's wrong in exciting new ways instead of the familiar old ways. Progress!

The corporate dream of running AI on budget hardware is the tech equivalent of asking someone to build you a Ferrari with Lego parts and a rubber band. First they want AI to handle its own authentication (because security is just a suggestion, right?), then they want to run it on a $5 VPS that struggles to host a static HTML page. And the AI's response? Pure existential dread that perfectly captures what goes through my mind during requirements gathering meetings. Next they'll ask if it can run in a browser, offline, with no dependencies, while making coffee and filing their taxes.

Oh great, another AI that's outsmarting us at our own game. Literally. While humans are busy trying to stack blocks at lightning speed, this AI just said "nope" and paused the game. Talk about finding the loophole in the requirements! "Survive as long as possible" doesn't specify you have to actually play . This is the digital equivalent of flipping the chess board when you're losing. Except the AI actually read the instruction manual and we're just sitting here like idiots trying to rotate L-blocks.

Ah, the evolution of debugging assistance. In 2019, you'd explain your problem to a rubber duck (a legitimate debugging technique where explaining your code aloud helps you spot the error). The duck just sits there, judging you silently while you ramble about line 43. Fast forward to 2025: Now you just bark "FIX THE ERROR" at ChatGPT, Claude, or whatever AI overlord is running your IDE. No need to understand the problem anymore - just demand a solution and watch as the machines do what took us mere mortals hours of Stack Overflow scrolling. The real error was thinking we'd still be doing our own debugging.

Picture this: You just spent half your monthly AI token budget asking Claude to "vibe check" your code like it's your therapist, only to realize the solution was literally changing ONE variable name. But hey, your manager is shaking your hand like you just discovered penicillin, so you're standing there with that forced smile knowing you basically paid $50 to have an AI tell you what your rubber duck could've figured out for free. The real tragedy? You could've just... read the error message. Used console.log. Asked literally anyone on Slack. But no, you went full premium AI mode for what turned out to be the programming equivalent of asking Siri to remind you where you left your phone while holding it. The awkward handshake energy is IMMACULATE because deep down you know the truth: Claude saw your code, probably judged you silently, and you still had to do all the actual work yourself. But sure, let's take credit for "using modern tools efficiently" or whatever corporate speak makes this feel less like highway robbery.

Remember when programmers were basically coding demigods who could bend computers to their will? Now we're just sad creatures Googling "how to center div" for the 500th time and begging AI to fix our mistakes. The golden age programmer wrote code without StackOverflow, crafted entire games in Assembly (you know, that language that makes you want to cry), manually fixed memory leaks with pointers, and literally hand-coded the software that put humans on the freaking moon. Meanwhile, modern programmers are trapped in Vim wondering why :q doesn't work, fixing one bug only to create three more like some kind of hydra nightmare, and asking ChatGPT to solve problems we should probably understand ourselves. The decline is real, folks. But hey, at least we have dark mode now.