The Turing Test: Just Change "Loading..." To "Thinking..."

When the job description says "R knowledge required, Python mostly used," but then you show up and discover it's 99% R with that one random pandas script someone wrote 3 years ago. The classic bait-and-switch where data scientists get lured by the promise of Python only to find themselves knee-deep in R's cryptic syntax and bizarre indexing. Meanwhile, Python sits there looking all smug because everyone claims to love it, but nobody actually lets you use it for the cool projects.

Someone's offering you a brain but you're like "nah, I'm good" because you've got AI to do the thinking for you. The irony here is chef's kiss—rejecting actual cognitive function in favor of letting ChatGPT write your code. We've reached peak efficiency: why learn algorithms when you can just prompt engineer your way through life? Your rubber duck debugging sessions have been replaced by asking GPT to fix your bugs while you pretend to understand the solution it spits out. The brain is literally being rejected at the door while AI gets the VIP pass.

Ah, the classic LinkedIn clickbait switcheroo! Someone's proudly announcing their addiction to the "PORN stack" - which turns out to be P ostgreSQL, O penAI, R eact, and N ext.js. The perfect tech stack for your resume and guaranteed heart attacks for HR departments everywhere. Bonus points for the 703 reactions from developers who nearly spat out their coffee before realizing it's just another tech acronym. Job recruiters must be having a field day with their keyword searches!

Tech companies promising "democratized AI for everyone" until you ask about pricing is the tech industry's oldest bait and switch. Sure, they're "being honest" about making AI available—just conveniently forgetting to mention it'll cost you the equivalent of a car payment. And that awkward moment when the customer actually thanks them for the privilege of being financially drained? Pure Stockholm syndrome that every product manager dreams of.

Content in Linkedin You appeared in 367 searches this week Woah. So where's my job?

ChatGPT spent 69 minutes and 42 seconds "thinking" just to tell you "You can't." That's like watching your senior architect stare at the whiteboard for over an hour during a planning meeting, only for them to turn around and say "nope, not possible" without any further explanation. The irony here is beautiful. Someone's trying to install CUDA 12.1 on Ubuntu 24.04, and the AI that supposedly saves you weeks of work just burned over an hour to deliver the most unhelpful two-word response possible. No workarounds, no alternatives, no "but here's what you CAN do" — just pure, unfiltered rejection. You could've googled this, read three Stack Overflow threads, tried two wrong solutions, and still had time left over to make coffee. But sure, let's call it "incredible" and a "solid product." The future of development is waiting 69 minutes for a chatbot to say no.