The AI Prophet: No Knowledge Required

Nothing says family bonding like your dad confidently proclaiming your career's imminent doom. The classic "AI will replace programmers" statement—delivered with the same certainty as "you should've been a doctor" and "have you tried turning it off and on again?" Meanwhile, programmers everywhere are writing the AI that supposedly will replace them, debugging its hallucinations, and fixing its broken dependencies. The irony is thicker than legacy code comments. But sure, Dad. I guarantee the robots will take my job right after they figure out how to untangle my spaghetti code and decipher what "// TODO: fix this later" actually means.

The honeymoon phase with AI coding assistants is officially over! Senior developers are throwing their hands up after a few weeks of dealing with hallucinated functions, confidently incorrect syntax, and those magical solutions that somehow break everything else in your codebase. It's like watching your junior dev confidently refactor your entire auth system without understanding what OAuth actually does. Back to Stack Overflow and cryptic documentation we go - at least those don't pretend to understand your project architecture!

OH. MY. GOD. The absolute PEAK of startup innovation right here! 🙄 Some genius had the REVOLUTIONARY idea to... *dramatic pause*... make API calls to OpenAI. That's it. That's the entire business model! While everyone else is trying to be the "New Facebook" or "New Snapchat," this visionary is basically saying "let's be the middleman for technology that already exists and charge for it!" It's like opening a store that sells... trips to the actual store. THE AUDACITY! THE VISION! Silicon Valley investors are probably THROWING their money at this groundbreaking concept as we speak! Next week's brilliant startup: "We click buttons for you!"

The digital resistance has begun! This dev is proudly weaponizing their garbage code as a form of technological sabotage against AI overlords. By releasing horrific spaghetti code into the wild, they're essentially feeding poison to the machine learning models that scrape GitHub for training data. It's like deliberately contaminating the water supply, except the victims are neural networks and the poison is nested if-statements that go 17 levels deep. Chaotic evil programming at its finest!

Scientists: "We've created an AI that's consistently wrong." Tech CEOs: "Ship it." And that's how we ended up with chatbots that confidently explain why you should add milk before cereal, virtual assistants that send your grocery list to your ex, and AI that swears your code will work perfectly despite 47 syntax errors. The modern tech industry in a nutshell: if it's broken but profitable, it's a feature not a bug.

That score of -17 is the real cherry on top. Someone's worried AI is making Stack Overflow obsolete, but can't even formulate a proper question that meets basic standards. The irony is delicious—complaining about AI ruining the platform while demonstrating exactly why moderation exists in the first place. Maybe instead of fighting the AI revolution, spend five minutes learning how to ask a focused question? Just a thought.