I Should Have Asked At Stack Overflow

When your machine learning course gets too intense, so you take it to the next level—literally. This is what happens when someone takes "deep learning" a bit too literally. While neural networks are diving into layers of abstraction, this person is diving into a pool with their textbook. The irony is palpable—studying underwater won't make your AI algorithms any more fluid, but it might make your textbook unusable. Next up: "reinforcement learning" at the gym and "natural language processing" by shouting at trees.

The ETERNAL promise of AI replacing programmers is basically the tech industry's biggest ghosting story! Everyone's been clutching their pearls about AI taking over coding jobs since FOREVER, but the answer is always "mañana" (tomorrow) - which is just fancy Spanish for "never gonna happen but we'll keep threatening you with it." It's like waiting for that friend who says they're "five minutes away" but they haven't even gotten out of bed yet. The AI revolution is ALWAYS just around the corner, darling! Meanwhile, programmers are still debugging the same stack overflow errors they were fixing a decade ago. The drama! The suspense! The complete lack of actual job replacement!

Finally, Microsoft acknowledges what we've known all along - their software requires pharmaceutical intervention. "Steve's Balm" with "Copilot enhanced formulation" is the perfect remedy for that blue screen migraine you've been nursing since the last forced update. The irony of Microsoft selling the cure for the problem they created is just *chef's kiss*. It's like your arsonist neighbor opening a fire extinguisher store next door. Side effects may include: sudden urge to reboot, unexplained file loss, and the compulsion to pay for subscriptions you don't need.

Squinting at "LLM Token Pricing" with confusion, then putting on glasses to see "Microtransaction For Devs" with sudden clarity. That moment when you realize OpenAI isn't selling you API access—they're selling you the gaming industry's most hated business model. "That'll be $0.002 per token to debug your code. Want to generate an entire function? That's the premium package, buddy." Next they'll be selling loot boxes with random completions. "Congratulations! You got three hallucinations and a refused response!"

Everyone's terrified of superintelligent AI destroying humanity, meanwhile actual AI is just slapping "-uary" onto every month like a sleep-deprived intern. "Maruary" and "Apruary" sound like months from a parallel universe where calendars were designed by a five-year-old. The real existential threat isn't Skynet—it's spreadsheets with months that sound like they were named after drinking too much eggnog. If this is the AI revolution, we can probably hold off on building those bunkers.

The robot overlord declares AI will replace programmers if it gets "clear customer needs and detailed specs" while below, a product manager sits calmly stating "the customer want a button that does stuff." Plot twist: programmers' job security isn't threatened by AI but protected by the eternal vagueness of requirements. The mythical "detailed spec" is rarer than a bug-free first commit. Even quantum computers couldn't parse "make it pop" or "just like Amazon but better."