Designers vs Programmers: The AI Generation Wars

When you ask Jules AI to help with your configuration and it decides security is for the weak. From port 443 (HTTPS) to 8080 (plain HTTP), SSL disabled, and the cherry on top—replacing your environment variable with a hardcoded "password" literally called "dummy." This is what happens when you let AI write your security config. Next up: storing credit card numbers in a public GitHub repo called "definitely_not_important_stuff."

Job postings be like "Entry-level position, must have 500 years of experience." The hierarchy is perfect: demon lord with 500 years? Barely qualified. Wizard with 1000 years? Now we're talking. Fresh graduate who just learned to code? Straight to the unemployment pit with the other rejected souls. The real kicker is that AI logo casually sitting there, because apparently even immortal beings can't compete with ChatGPT's ability to hallucinate code at lightning speed. Companies would rather hire a statistical parrot than someone who "only" has a millennium of hands-on experience. The tech job market has officially transcended reality—you need to be older than COBOL itself just to get past the ATS screening.

Content MACHINE LEARNING inglip.com

Modern problems require modern solutions! This dev is playing 5D chess with AI - opening tabs for ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Grok, and DeepSeek to ask them all the exact same coding question. Then the real programming begins: copy-paste each AI's answer into separate Python files, run them all, and cherry-pick the winner. It's basically Hunger Games for AI models. The ultimate "why debug your own code when you can make five AIs fight to the death for the correct solution?" approach. Bonus points for efficiency - why spend hours on Stack Overflow when you can delegate your decision paralysis to multiple neural networks simultaneously?

The eternal battle between enthusiasm and experience. Junior devs excitedly promoting AI-generated code like it's the second coming of programming Jesus, while senior devs stare back with the thousand-yard gaze of someone who's spent years cleaning up "quick solutions." That silent stare says everything: "Sure, your AI wrote it in 5 seconds... and I'll spend 5 days figuring out why it breaks in production while you're happily generating more technical debt." The cycle of software development continues, just with fancier tools to create the same old problems.

Asking how to check LLM code quality without being an expert is like asking how to check if your parachute works without jumping out of a plane. The irony is delicious - you're using an LLM to ask how to evaluate LLM-generated code. It's the digital equivalent of asking a toddler if they think they should have more candy. The answer is always "yes" and always suspiciously in their favor.