Why You Don't Use ChatGPT?

You know that moment when your LLM autocomplete is so confident it suggests a function that sounds absolutely perfect—great naming convention, fits the context beautifully—except for one tiny problem: it doesn't exist anywhere in your codebase or any library you've imported? That's the AI equivalent of a friend confidently giving you directions to a restaurant that closed down three years ago. The LLM is basically hallucinating API calls based on patterns it's seen, creating these Frankenstein functions that should exist in a perfect world but sadly don't. It's like when GitHub Copilot suggests array.sortByVibes() and you're sitting there thinking "man, I wish that was real." The side-eye in this meme captures that perfect blend of disappointment and reluctant acceptance—like yeah, I get it, you tried, but now I gotta actually write this myself.

Job postings be like "Entry-level position, must have 500 years of experience." The hierarchy is perfect: demon lord with 500 years? Barely qualified. Wizard with 1000 years? Now we're talking. Fresh graduate who just learned to code? Straight to the unemployment pit with the other rejected souls. The real kicker is that AI logo casually sitting there, because apparently even immortal beings can't compete with ChatGPT's ability to hallucinate code at lightning speed. Companies would rather hire a statistical parrot than someone who "only" has a millennium of hands-on experience. The tech job market has officially transcended reality—you need to be older than COBOL itself just to get past the ATS screening.

The evolution of software engineering in its natural habitat! First, we have the innocent "Software Engineer" - just a regular Pooh bear doing honest work. Then there's the slightly pretentious "Sr Software Engineer" - same bear, just wearing a tux and acting fancy because they learned what a design pattern is. But the final form? The "pRoMpt eNgiNeEr" with that cursed ransom-note typography - it's just a deranged panda typing "make me a website that looks like Amazon but better" into ChatGPT and calling it coding. The tech industry's equivalent of ordering a pizza and claiming you made dinner.

Stack Overflow questions are dropping faster than a production database after someone ran a migration without a backup. The graph shows a steady decline from peak toxicity around 2014 to near-ghost-town levels in 2024. Turns out when you build an AI that actually helps instead of marking everything as duplicate and closing questions within 30 seconds, people stop needing the digital equivalent of asking directions from a New Yorker. ChatGPT doesn't tell you your question is "off-topic" or that you should "just Google it" before providing a condescending answer. The irony? Stack Overflow spent years training developers that asking questions is shameful. Now those same developers trained an AI on Stack Overflow's data, and the AI is nicer than the community ever was. Full circle.

The ultimate double standard! 😂 While designers freak out when DALL-E 2 steals their artwork, programmers are over here like "You stole my GitHub code? Sweet! Did you actually make that garbage run properly?" It's the coding equivalent of saying "I left that mess on purpose as a trap for the next poor soul!" The desperation of "pls fix my garbage code" is the silent plea we've all made when sharing our repos. We're not stealing code, we're just... collaboratively debugging . 👨‍💻✨

When Discord announced they're adding AI features and TeamSpeak suddenly started showing signs of life after being in hibernation since 2009, developers everywhere felt a disturbance in the Force. Discord (the corpo overlord) thought devs would just roll over and accept their new "features" that definitely won't be used to train AI models on your private conversations. Meanwhile, TeamSpeak – the OG voice chat that everyone thought was six feet under – casually strolls back into the scene like "reports of my death were greatly exaggerated." Turns out self-hosted, privacy-respecting software doesn't look so ancient when the alternative is having an AI bot lurking in your voice channels. Who knew that not wanting your debugging sessions fed into a language model would make TeamSpeak relevant again? The irony is delicious: companies keep adding "features" nobody asked for, and suddenly software from the dial-up era becomes the hot new thing.