Why You Don't Use ChatGPT?

The modern developer dichotomy in its full glory! Up top we've got the polished, well-groomed developers who just copy-paste from Stack Overflow, Google search results, and ask ChatGPT to fix their bugs. Meanwhile, the documentation readers below look like they've been coding for 72 hours straight, sustained purely by Monster Energy and sheer determination. Reading docs is apparently the programming equivalent of staring into the void until the void stares back. The best part? Those documentation demons probably write better code than the rest of us combined. Choose your fighter: pretty but dependent, or unhinged but powerful.

The classic programmer's dilemma! When your university teacher announces they'll teach Python for OpenCV because "most students don't know it," but you're standing there with 8 years of experience facing two equally painful paths: either pretend you're learning everything from scratch (boring castle on the left) or flex your skills by showing off some absolutely demonic code that'll make your professor question their career choices (haunted lightning castle on the right). The fork in the road represents that moment of decision every experienced dev faces in intro classes - do I play it safe or do I unleash chaos? Spoiler alert: we always choose chaos.

Imagine inheriting a dumpster fire of AI-generated spaghetti code, and someone thinks you can fix everything from authentication to CI/CD with the budget that wouldn't even cover your therapy sessions after seeing the codebase. That $2,500 budget is the real joke here. That's not even enough for the coffee you'll need to stay awake while deciphering what the hell the AI was thinking when it generated this monstrosity. This is the modern tech equivalent of "I need you to rebuild the Titanic using only duct tape and a tight deadline. Oh, and can you make it unsinkable this time?"

Google's corporate evolution in one image. Started with "Don't Be Evil" in 2004, now apparently pivoting to "Killbots For Sale" by 2025. Typical tech company lifecycle - begin with idealistic college dorm room philosophy, end with weaponized AI that can efficiently terminate human life. Progress, I guess? Shareholders must be thrilled. Nothing says "increased quarterly earnings" like autonomous killing machines. Just waiting for the AWS Terminator instance pricing page to drop.

The ultimate self-snitch! Kid tries to use ChatGPT for a Shakespeare essay, but forgets to remove the "I'm an AI language model" disclaimer. Meanwhile, teachers are panicking about AI cheating while students are literally submitting papers that start with "As an AI language model..." 🤦‍♂️ It's like showing up to rob a bank while wearing a name tag and your work uniform. The real education here isn't Shakespeare—it's learning to at least delete the first paragraph of your AI-generated homework!

Oh. My. GOD. The AUDACITY of this job posting! 💀 They want the "top 0.01%" with IQs over 140 who work 80+ hours weekly and can "replace teams of 20 with their own mind" — but will generously give you $10k even if you don't join! How MAGNANIMOUS! 🙄 The absolute DELUSION of saying "AI writes better code than most devs" while hunting for superhuman coding unicorns who apparently don't need sleep, friends, or basic human enjoyment! Honey, if your AI is so amazing, why not just hire IT instead of demanding people who can "think 10 steps ahead and ship in hours"? Translation: "We're looking for desperate geniuses willing to sacrifice their entire existence for our startup that will DEFINITELY change the world economy... trust us!"