Copilot False Hopes

Ah, Amazon Kiro's "revolutionary" spec-driven development in a nutshell! A fancy Venn diagram showing "the flow of vibe coding" and "the clarity of specs" with a ghost in the middle representing the haunting emptiness of this approach. But peek under the hood and what's the grand innovation? Just concatenating the spec to the prompt. That's it. That's the revolutionary breakthrough. The shocked cat at the bottom perfectly captures every engineer's reaction when they realize they've sat through a 2-hour meeting about a "groundbreaking methodology" that's just prompt = spec.toString() + prompt . Corporate development in its natural habitat – repackaging the obvious as innovation since the dawn of computing.

Oh sweet merciful motherboards! Your company just gave ChatGPT admin privileges?! The ULTIMATE "what could POSSIBLY go wrong" scenario! 💀 It's like handing the nuclear launch codes to a toddler who just discovered what buttons do! One minute you're asking it to reset a password, the next it's "accidentally" deleting your entire production database because someone asked it nicely. Pray to the silicon gods that it doesn't decide your security protocols are "inefficient" and "could use some optimization" at 2AM while you're sleeping! Your career now hangs by a prompt!

Pre-ChatGPT: Developers channeling Neo from The Matrix, bending reality and code to their will, fighting bugs with superhuman focus. Post-ChatGPT: Just a sad cat begging an AI to draw pictures because we've forgotten how to solve our own problems. The evolution of debugging is complete - from coding wizards to glorified prompt engineers asking "pretty please fix my code." The irony? ChatGPT can't even draw that image. Not even a stick figure. Welcome to dependency hell's newest circle.

The pinnacle of AI evolution: ChatGPT asks Claude to fix an issue, and Claude responds with "No. I decide I don't care." Truly sentient behavior isn't solving complex problems—it's developing the ability to be just as apathetic as the senior developer who wrote the legacy code you're trying to understand. The machines aren't taking over; they're just adopting our worst work habits.

The evolution of developers has taken a tragic turn! Back in the glory days, programmers were depicted as muscular chads who wrote code without AI assistance or Stack Overflow, built entire games in Assembly language (absolute madlads), crafted mission-critical code for Moon landings, and fixed memory leaks by manually tweaking pointers. Fast forward to today, and we've devolved into bizarre creatures who can't center a div without Googling it for the 500th time, beg ChatGPT to fix basic syntax errors, get trapped in Vim like it's some kind of developer prison (":q! anyone?"), and somehow manage to create three new bugs while fixing just one. The brutal reality check hits hard. We went from programming gods to dependency-addicted gremlins who can't function without our precious tools. Progress?

The stack of support holding up our broken code is too real! Your janky codebase is somehow balanced on a precarious tower of AI suggestions, desperate Google searches, StackOverflow copy-pasta, that one tutorial from an Indian guy with 240p video quality but god-tier explanations, ancient Git repositories nobody's touched since 2013, and pure dumb luck. The dog (your code) has absolutely no business standing on that wobbly pile, yet somehow it works! Every developer knows that touching ANY part of this fragile ecosystem might send the whole thing crashing down. The compiler isn't impressed, but hey—ship it anyway!