Ancient IBM Wisdom That The Bosses Just Straight Up Promptly Forgot

The evolution of developer dependency in record time. We went from "this AI thing is neat" to "I literally cannot function without it" faster than a React framework gets deprecated. What's wild is how accurate this timeline is. 2023 was all about experimentation—"Hey ChatGPT, write me a regex for email validation" (because let's be real, nobody actually knows regex). Now? We're one API outage away from collective panic. It's like we speedran the entire adoption curve and skipped straight to Stockholm syndrome. The real question for 2026 isn't whether we can code without it—it's whether we'll even remember how. Stack Overflow is already gathering dust while we ask ChatGPT to explain why our code doesn't work, then ask it to fix the code it just wrote. Circle of life, baby.

Turns out the most advanced AI was just 700 people in a trenchcoat. Builder.ai allegedly sold "AI" that was actually just outsourced developers pretending to be Natasha the chatbot. The classic "artificial" intelligence that's actually just regular intelligence with extra steps. Next revelation: ChatGPT is just a guy named Greg in a basement with really fast typing skills.

Someone asked ChatGPT about JavaScript's export default App; syntax and got the most refreshingly honest AI response ever: "I honestly have no idea." Finally, an AI that admits defeat instead of confidently hallucinating some nonsensical explanation about React components! If only my junior devs had this level of self-awareness instead of copy-pasting Stack Overflow answers they don't understand. The robots might replace us, but at least they'll be upfront about their limitations.

The circle of startup AI innovation: Manager asks impossible question → Developer frantically asks ChatGPT → Developer presents ChatGPT's answer as their own work → Manager impressed → Company secures another round of funding. Let's be honest, half the "AI strategy" presentations in boardrooms right now are just regurgitated LLM outputs with fancy transitions. The real innovation is how quickly we've normalized outsourcing our thinking to robots while maintaining our poker faces.

Copilot is that "helpful" AI pair programmer who creates more problems than it solves. It's like having an intern who confidently writes myAwesomeVariableThatDoesStuff when your codebase uses snake_case, adds comments like "// This function does things" and then has the audacity to hold your actual productivity hostage behind a paywall. The smug satisfaction on that farmer's face perfectly captures Copilot's attitude: "Sure, I wrote garbage code that violates every convention in your project, but hey... it ain't much, but it's honest work." Honest work my keyboard! It's digital sabotage with a subscription fee.

Oh. My. GOD. 🤦‍♂️ We've reached peak technological confusion! Someone is literally asking if an AI can compile their source code into an EXE file instead of, you know, USING AN ACTUAL COMPILER like the rest of us mere mortals who spent years learning how computers actually work! The absolute AUDACITY to skip the entire software development process and just ask AI to magically poof an executable into existence! Next they'll be asking ChatGPT to make them a sandwich while debugging their non-existent code! This is what happens when "learn to code" tutorials skip the chapter on "what compilation actually is" and jump straight to "just ask the robots to do it!"