It's All Webviews? Always Has Been

The eternal battle between self-proclaimed "real programmers" and the rising "vibe coders" who just ship stuff! This post brilliantly skewers the gatekeeping culture in software development. On one side, we have the GitHub purists judging everyone's code quality, design patterns, and commit messages. On the other, we have people who might Google "how to center a div" 10 times daily but somehow manage to ship working products. The real magic happens when you've internalized enough patterns that you can focus on building rather than constantly looking things up. It's not about memorizing algorithms or being a "real programmer" – it's about getting stuff done while maintaining enough quality to sleep at night. Fun fact: Some of the most successful products in tech history were built by people who would fail a traditional whiteboard coding interview. The code that runs the world isn't always pretty, but it works!

Look at these American cloud giants getting the Toy Story treatment. After years of Stockholm syndrome relationships with AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure, European dev teams are finally having their "Jessie moment." Nothing says "I've reconsidered our toxic relationship" like migrating to Hetzner after your AWS bill suddenly includes a 25% tariff surcharge. Sure, the documentation might be in German, but it's still more comprehensible than Lambda's pricing structure. Scaleway doesn't have 47 different database options? Good. I didn't understand the difference between the last 46 anyway.

Schrödinger's Developer: simultaneously alive enough to fill out an online death certificate form, yet dead enough to need one. The ultimate edge case that no UX designer anticipated! How exactly is a deceased person supposed to select "Myself" here? This is what happens when you skip those user stories about zombies during sprint planning. Next up: the form probably asks for your email to send confirmation that you're successfully dead.

The meme brutally murders the misconception that Java and JavaScript are related just because they share "Java" in their names. It's like assuming cars and carpets are related because they both start with "car." The naming similarity is purely coincidental—JavaScript was named during the peak of Java's popularity as a marketing gimmick. One's a compiled, statically-typed language that runs on a virtual machine; the other's an interpreted, dynamically-typed language that powers the web. Different ancestors, different purposes, different ecosystems. Next up: explaining why hamburgers contain no ham.

IMAGINE THE UTOPIA WE WERE ROBBED OF! 😭 JavaScript, the language that powers 99% of the web, was infamously created by Brendan Eich in just 10 DAYS back in 1995. TEN. DAYS. The result? A language with more quirks than a cat café on catnip! One more day could have fixed the nightmare that is type coercion, the existential crisis of null vs undefined , and that absolute TRAVESTY where [] + [] equals an empty string but [] + {} is "[object Object]"! The audacity! Now we're all stuck patching this cosmic joke with TypeScript like putting designer bandaids on a coding catastrophe. Just ONE more day, Brendan! We could've had flying cars instead of framework fatigue!

The existential dread noose is tightening around everyone's neck! Developers think they're special snowflakes trembling about AI taking their precious coding jobs, while completely forgetting that translators, designers, and support staff have been dangling from the gallows of automation for months already. It's like watching someone panic about a tsunami while standing next to people who are already neck-deep in water. The irony is that devs are literally building the very AI tools that will eventually replace them. Talk about sawing off the branch you're sitting on!