When You Want To Watch A Dev Slowly Descend Into Madness

The JavaScript pushState() function has an unused parameter that literally does nothing but can't be removed because... backward compatibility! 🤦‍♂️ It's like that one useless function parameter that's been in your codebase for 5 years and everyone's too scared to remove it because "something might break." The documentation even admits it with a straight face: "This parameter exists for historical reasons, and cannot be omitted." The red scribbles perfectly capture every developer's reaction: "??? WTF" - which is basically the official technical term for legacy code maintenance.

Content laya 3d Figma Drawin Blender Character drawing 2D Digit do desig Graphic Design Native Svelte.j ME Blockcha Unity Game development Unfinished Flutter App

Content Sir, the Al is inbreeding. 3) Lazar Lockman; Artificer in cha... 20h So, apparently Al 'art' is encountering a problem. There is so much Al 'art' out there that the programs are now starting to pull from it. And Al 'art' created through referencing Al 'art' is yielding worse and wo... ProarammerHumor.io

Content STOP ADDING FEATURES TO WEB BROWSERS AND JAVASCRIPT Chrome is not supposed to be able to run feature-complete Photoshop Hundreds of implemented TC-39 proposals, yet no real-world use found for running CRust applications inside of a browser window Wanted to run a program written in javascript with filesystem access for fun anyways? We had a tool for that, it's called NodeJS. "Yes please, give me Array.at (-1) and private class members", "Please give me finer manual memory allocation in WASM" - Statements dreamed up by the utterly deranged. Look at what Web Developers have been demanding your respect for, all this time, with all the API's we built for them: .???? ???? 222 debugging c code inside of the devtools running neural networks on the client side rendering shaders with WebGPUGL Hello, i would like JI('0) 1(' )!!I apples please They have played us for absolute fools

Someone reverse-engineered the Honey browser extension (you know, the "coupon finder" that supposedly saves you money) and found some... interesting code. The highlighted sections show tracking events being sent with coupon data, and then there's a function literally called maybeShowUserShare() . Not "definitely protect user privacy" or "ask for consent" - just maybe show the user you're sharing their data. The function name is doing some heavy lifting here. It's like naming a function maybeStealYourWallet() and acting surprised when people get upset. The code is sending analytics events with coupon codes and tracking whether coupons were applied - all that juicy e-commerce data that's worth its weight in affiliate commission gold. Nothing says "trustworthy" quite like discovering the free money-saving tool you installed is potentially monetizing your shopping habits without being super transparent about it. But hey, at least the developer was honest enough to use "maybe" in the function name. That's more transparency than most privacy policies give you.

Content woW! HOW DID YOU GET LIKE THAT? EVERY TIME Someone posts this ...I DO ONE PUSH-UP. JESUS CHRIST.