Tester Or Developer: Two Very Different Relationships

Content TESTER TESTER DEVELOPER DEVELOPER TESTER TESTE DEVELOPER DEVELOPER

Content e4moji e4moji If I had a nickel for every time I got confused, I'd be like "where'd this nickel come from?" and then there'd be another nickel and I'd think "what's with the nickels?" leading to more nickels and confusion and eventually I'd be slowly crushed by nickels without ever knowing why

That sweet, sweet whisper of "0 warnings, 0 errors" from the compiler is basically foreplay for developers. The sheer ecstasy of code that compiles perfectly on the first try is so rare that when it happens, it literally gives us physical goosebumps. It's that magical moment when you've written 500 lines of code and somehow didn't mess up a single semicolon, bracket, or variable name. Pure. Developer. Bliss.

Content TOP DEFINITION C f S A programming language for Real Men. Most languages try to provide a simplified way to solve specific problems well. C makes no such concession and tries to be mediocre at everything. It lets you program at a very high level, and a very low level in the same program. It lets you write procedural code, object oriented code, generic code and mix them all up. It makes you decide everything and provides no help if you get it wrong. It is by far the biggest, most complicated, ugly, down-right dangerous language you can use. But it does run fast. It takes at least twice as long to program in C as any other major language (except C). The men who program in C are Real Men. The women who program in C are Real Men too. You can spot a C programmer from their testosterone fueled swagger, and the unbelievable amount of contempt they inject into the phrase Java "programmer". They'll probably do the air quotes and all. Dev: 'Hey, Reg, you know C right? What does: "Isrc Cont. spp(52) : error C2679: binary '': no operator found which takes a right- hand operand of type 'int' (or there is no acceptable conversion) C: Program Files Microsoft Visual Studio 8VC include vector(392): could be 'std::VectoriteratorTy, Alloc std::VectoriteratorTy, Alloc::operator (const std::VectoriteratorTy, Alloc)' with TyMain::Cont, Allocstd::allocatorMain::Cont while trying to match the argument list "(std::VectoriteratorTy, Alloc, int)' with TyMain::Cont, Allocstd::allocatorMain::Cont " mean?' Reg: 'You missed a semicolon at the end of the line.'

That smug little face says it all. You ask a simple yes/no question and instead of a clean true or false , they hit you with "I'll think about it" or some other useless string response. It's like asking someone if they want pizza and they respond with their entire life story. Boolean functions should return boolean values—it's literally in the name! But no, some developers just love to watch the world burn by returning strings like "maybe" or "undefined" when all you wanted was a straightforward answer. Then you're stuck with extra validation code because apparently if(isUserLoggedIn()) wasn't simple enough.

That moment when your code inexplicably stops working despite changing absolutely nothing. You're just sitting there, exhausted, notebook in hand, trying to solve the cosmic mystery of why the exact same lines that ran perfectly yesterday now throw 17 different errors. The universe has decided your semicolons are suddenly offensive. Time to stare blankly at the screen for three hours before discovering a ghost space character that shouldn't mathematically affect anything, yet somehow fixes everything.