If You Will Test Your Program In One Non EFIGS Locale Let It Be Turkish No Joke

Content Why does HTML think "chucknorris" is a color? Asked 12 years, 2 months ago Modified 13 days ago Viewed 749k times Why do certain random strings produce colors when entered as background colors in HTML? 8757 For example, bcolor"chucknorris" produces a red background: body bcolor"chucknorris" test body Run code snippet Hide results L Full page test Conversely, bcolor"chucknorr" produces a yellow background: body bacolor chucknorr" test body Run code snippet hide resus Full page test This holds true across various browsers and platforms. What's going on here? html browser background-color Share Improve this question Follow edited Jun 6, 2022 at 7:37 Mateen Ulhaa 25.5k 20 104 141 asked Nov 29, 2011 at 22:54 X: user456584 805 87.3K 016 78 107 ProdrammerHumor.io

Content Peter Ritchie peterritchie Follow MT: Replace a semicolon (;) with a greek question mark (;) in your friend's C code and watch them pull their hair out over the syntax error 13 RETWEETS 1,410 FAVORITES 926 QR 5:55 PM - 16 Nov 2014

The absolute carnage of 5 hours of debugging only to find that the bug is completely unfazed by your suffering. That smug Night King face screams "I could have been fixed with a semicolon, but I chose violence." The most horrifying part? The bug will return in production with three new friends after you thought you squashed it. Nothing says software engineering quite like staring into the abyss while the abyss stares back with a runtime error.

You know you've been in the trenches too long when a clean compile feels less like success and more like a trap. That code that compiles first try? Yeah, it's gorgeous on the surface, but your battle-scarred instincts are screaming that runtime errors are lurking somewhere in there like landmines. The compiler's silence isn't reassuring—it's suspicious. Where are the warnings? The type mismatches? The missing semicolons? When everything works immediately, experienced devs don't celebrate, they start writing test cases with the paranoia of someone who's been burned too many times. Because we all know the truth: the compiler only checks syntax. Logic errors, race conditions, off-by-one mistakes, null pointer nightmares—those are all waiting patiently in production to ruin your weekend.

Content TESTER TESTER DEVELOPER DEVELOPER TESTER TESTE DEVELOPER DEVELOPER

Content Things I have learnt from this subreddit as a non programmer - Users just do things that they are not supposed to do and It looks like they are purposely trying to break the code. - Legacy code is written and understood only by gods and they only way to convert it into modern code is to fucking write the thing from scratch. - Jobs require ungodly amount of experience. They want a full stack developer EVERY FUCKING TIME. - Senior devs have given up on life and they just do just enough to get their salaries. They work on production just for the thriller. - There is a communication gap between the client and the programmer just because of the fucking management. - You should never work on the main branch and push things to production but its the norm. - Debugging is staring at the code until it works again. - Programmers just copy and paste code. The only real programmers to ever exist are Terry Davis and some random people who maintain libraries that are responsible for doing math on every computer on the planet. - There is just some mystery code in every codebase that appears to do nothing but when removed sets everything in flames. It is usually commented "Don't touch". - If you ask anything on StackOverflow, Its a stupid question. - Sales teams tell the client that the devs can make everything happen even if its computationally impossible. - Its better to take 5 hours solving bugs rather than spend 5 minutes reading the documentation. Programmers don't have lives anyways. - If you are seeking to learn programming learn JavaScript. The next step is to find a new career