Sí Más Más: When Programming Languages Get Lost In Translation

The evolution of programming weapons, perfectly illustrated. Assembler is your basic knife with a scope—minimal but precise. C is just a bullet with a hammer, because who needs safety features? C++ straps five different weapons together with duct tape and calls it "object-oriented." And then there's Python, which looks like it was designed by a committee of drunk engineers who couldn't decide what they wanted, so they included everything. "Yes, it's inefficient and ridiculous looking, but look how fast I can deploy it!"

Random Twitter user: "Your codebase is a mess." FFmpeg (written in C and assembly): "Talk is cheap, send patches." The ultimate open-source mic drop. Nothing says "put up or shut up" quite like challenging critics to actually contribute to a notoriously complex codebase that even seasoned developers approach with caution. It's the programming equivalent of saying "I'd like to see you try" while sipping tea with your pinky out.

When your coding interview asks you to implement FizzBuzz but you've spent the last decade writing unreadable code to impress your colleagues. That's not just FizzBuzz—that's FizzBuzz with extra steps, obfuscation, and a sprinkle of "I'm too smart for readable solutions." Nothing says "hire me" like turning a 5-line problem into cryptic sorcery using the __LINE__ macro to loop through numbers. The interviewer wanted to see if you could code; you showed them you could create puzzles that would make the Sphinx quit its day job.

Ah yes, the presidential decree of bad programming practices. Nothing says "Make Software Great Again" like starting arrays at 1 (a crime in most programming languages), using only global variables (the radioactive waste of code), and deploying untested code straight to production on a Friday (the ultimate "I hate my weekend" power move). It's basically an executive order to create job security through chaos. Ten years of debugging later, you'll still be finding remnants of this administration in your codebase.

The eternal C++ struggle summed up in one painful exchange. You spend an hour debugging a function that seemingly does nothing, only to realize the horrifying truth - you never actually called it. Just declared it and walked away like it would magically execute itself. The worst part? This happens to 10-year veterans as often as day-one beginners. Nothing quite matches that special feeling of wanting to throw your mechanical keyboard through a window after realizing your carefully crafted game physics engine isn't running because you forgot the parentheses.

Game devs are literally SUFFERING in their own special circle of development hell, and here they are, sipping coffee while laughing at regular programming memes like "Ah yes, humor based on MY pain." The AUDACITY! While web devs cry about centering divs, game programmers are over here wrestling with physics engines that defy actual physics, optimizing 60 FPS on hardware from 2010, and explaining to art directors why no, we cannot actually make the character's hair have 10,000 individually simulated strands. But sure, laugh at the JavaScript joke, it's FINE. TOTALLY FINE. 😭