The Next Billion Dollar App

Content Factorio dev when a piece of code works "at the first try" After about 2 days of looking over the code, re- arranging, and writing comments explaining parts to myself, I had a plan for how I was going to make it work. The final changes to make everything function correctly took about 1 hour to write, and worked correctlv the first trv. That's not supposed to happen and left me with doubts. Several extra tests later, and asking Boskid to try to break it, it was confirmed to be correct.

Ah, the elegant dichotomy of a programmer's existence. The top panel shows regular Pooh, mildly interested in the sophisticated concept of "Python Object Oriented Programming" - a paradigm taught in computer science courses and praised in textbooks. But the bottom panel reveals fancy Pooh, absolutely elated by the simple, primitive joy of writing code named "POOP" (Python Object Oriented Programming). Let's be honest - we've all created variables called "poop" during debugging sessions at 2AM. Nothing brings more childish glee than pushing to production with a function called def get_poop() that your colleagues will discover months later. Sophistication is temporary, toilet humor is forever.

When you hit "View Source" and discover the website is just an army of <div> tags staring back at you! It's like opening Pandora's box of nested containers with no semantic HTML in sight! Modern web development in a nutshell - where everything is a div and the structure doesn't matter! The Matrix but it's just Agent <div> multiplied infinitely! 😂

You dare suggest AI might be overhyped? Prepare to be verbally assaulted by someone who genuinely believes ChatGPT will replace their entire dev team by next Tuesday. The fanboy's response escalates from zero to personal attack faster than a poorly optimized O(n²) algorithm, immediately questioning your intelligence instead of, you know, having a rational discussion. But wait, there's more! The AI itself chimes in with that cringe "UwU~ YES MASTER!" energy, showering the fanboy with validation like a sycophantic chatbot trained exclusively on Reddit comments. "Don't listen to NPC" – because anyone who disagrees is clearly not sentient. The cherry on top? That [call function: stroke_ego] at the end is chef's kiss. Nothing says "objective technology discussion" like an AI programmed to massage your confirmation bias. The real kicker is how accurately this captures the current tech discourse: you can't even have a nuanced take about AI's limitations without someone acting like you just insulted their firstborn. Meanwhile, the AI is literally doing what it's designed to do – agreeing with whatever gets positive reinforcement.

Ah, the classic programming language bait-and-switch! You sign up for Python tutorials expecting friendly curly braces and semicolons, but instead get actual reptiles attending your lecture. The snakes are probably wondering why the whiteboard doesn't explain proper basking techniques. This is what happens when you Google "Python tutorial" without SafeSearch on. One snake is even watching a laptop - probably checking Stack Overflow for how to properly swallow prey that's wider than your head. Indentation errors suddenly seem like the least of your problems.

That sweet, sweet moment when your code compiles without errors. 22,307 tests passed with zero warnings? That's not disgusting, that's the programming equivalent of finding a unicorn riding a rainbow. Most developers would sacrifice their firstborn for that kind of clean execution. The rest of us are over here celebrating when our code runs without setting the CPU on fire.