Enshittification Of Software

HONEY, GRAB THE CHECKBOOK! This absolute MONSTER of a legacy code generator is being sold to us by a man in a suit! *dramatically faints* The car salesman is literally SLAPPING THE ROOF and promising us 50+ lines of legacy code PER SECOND! Do you know what that means?! That's approximately 4.3 MILLION lines of technical debt PER DAY! The maintenance nightmare of my DREAMS! 💸💸💸 And look at those logos - it's a blockchain-ethereum-something developer tool that will absolutely ruin our codebase faster than you can say "we should refactor this someday." SOLD!

Oh honey, the AUDACITY of trying to learn C++23 in 2025 when you haven't even mastered the ancient scrolls of C++20 modules! 💅 Then comes the voice of reason - that wise compiler wizard with Clang++ and CMake tattoos across their soul, gently dragging you back to reality: "Sweetie, let's start with C++17 first, mkay?" The absolute DRAMA of C++ version chasing! It's like trying to wear couture when you can't even button a shirt. Start with the basics, darling, before the template metaprogramming gods smite you with undefined behavior!

You've got your basic Python random.choice() up top, pulling from a list like it's some kind of peasant lottery. Then there's the wall of lava lamps—yes, actual lava lamps—which Cloudflare famously uses to generate cryptographic randomness by filming the chaotic blobs and feeding the data into their entropy pool. And at the bottom? Well, that's just pure chaos incarnate. The joke here is the escalating quality of randomness sources. Software RNG? Predictable if you know the seed. Lava lamps providing physical entropy? Now we're cooking with actual thermodynamic chaos. But the final panel suggests there exists an even more unpredictable source of randomness—one that operates entirely outside the bounds of logic, consistency, or any known algorithm. Cryptographers spend years trying to find truly random sources. Turns out they should've just been watching cable news.

OMG the MENTAL GYMNASTICS we go through to justify our coding inadequacies! 🤸‍♀️ First we're like "I hate Java but I'm TOTALLY a coding genius" then we're like "OK fine I'm garbage at programming BUT THAT'S NOT WHY I hate Java!" It's the programmer's version of a breakup: "It's not you Java, it's me... but also it's definitely you." The absolute AUDACITY of us to blame the language while writing spaghetti code that would make an Italian chef weep! We're all just out here writing trash code professionally and looking for someone else to blame. PEAK DEVELOPER ENERGY!

Content how to learn programming Q I FILTERS Why You Should Not Learn to Code (as an ex-Google programmer) 560K views 6 months ago TechLead Disclosure: Some links are affiliate links to products. I may receive a small commission for purchases made through these links. WHY YOU SHOULD NOT LEARN TO CODE. 12:29 WHY YOU SHOULD NOT LEARN TO CODE Why you should not learn to code. ("Just stop already, it's too hard.") 683K views 3 years ago TechLead Ex-Google TechLead THE TECHLEAD explains why you should not learn to code. The machines are coming for our jobs, and .. Subtitles

Content annie soychotic Every time I have a programming question and I rly need help, I post it on Reddit and then log into another account and reply to it with an obscenely incorrect answer. Ppl don't care about helping others but they LOVE correcting others. Works 100 of the time