Copy-Paste Driven Development At Its Finest

The circle of tech life continues. Nintendo's 3DS died in 2024, only for Samsung to resurrect the glasses-free 3D concept a year later with their fancy Odyssey monitor. Ten years of developers avoiding 3D like the plague, and now we're supposed to believe it's revolutionary again? Watch us waste another decade optimizing for a feature nobody asked for while our actual code still runs on duct tape and prayers.

The ultimate graphics card rebellion! This stick figure dictator has had enough of hyper-realistic ray-traced games where you can count individual arm hairs in 8K resolution. It's the perfect satire of how we've gone from "graphics don't matter, gameplay does!" to spending $3000 on GPUs just to see realistic water physics that we'll ignore after 5 minutes. The punishment? Back to text adventures and visual novels where your imagination has to do the heavy lifting. No DLSS or frame rate counters—just pure YOU ARE IN A MAZE OF TWISTY LITTLE PASSAGES, ALL ALIKE energy. Somewhere, a hardcore Dwarf Fortress player is nodding in approval.

Taking "Go & play outside" literally by dragging your entire gaming rig to a field is peak programmer malicious compliance. Technically correct—the best kind of correct! Sure, you're getting vitamin D, but you're still grinding that MMO while grasshoppers become your new debugging partners. The lengths we'll go to just to avoid touching grass in the metaphorical sense...

Ah, the beautiful irony of modern gaming! Kingdom Come: Deliverance 2 with its hyper-realistic medieval graphics only needs a modest GTX 1060 to run. Meanwhile, Borderlands 4 with its cartoony cell-shaded style demands an RTX 2070 minimum. It's like needing a supercomputer to run MS Paint while Photoshop runs on a calculator. Game engine optimization is clearly an arcane art that defies logic. The real medieval warfare isn't in the game—it's in your wallet fighting to afford unnecessary GPU upgrades for stylized graphics. Somewhere, a graphics programmer is cackling maniacally while writing the most inefficient shader code possible for those cartoon outlines.

The code is a perfect example of why game developers shouldn't be allowed near RNGs unsupervised! 😂 What we're looking at is a glorious mess of Python where someone created two nearly identical functions ( count_greater_than_11 and count_greater_than_5 ) that generate random numbers between 1-20 and increment a counter when the number exceeds a threshold. But wait! The function names and comments don't even match - one says "greater than 11" in the comment but checks for > 10 in the code, while the other claims to check for > 5 but actually checks for > 4! And then there's that lonely is_divisible_by_7 function at the bottom, just hanging out with no apparent connection to anything else. It's like someone started implementing their own version of RNG bias with specific magic numbers, got bored halfway through, and shipped it anyway. This is probably why that boss battle feels unfairly difficult every 7th attempt...

Ah, the classic game dev fantasy chart. That massive orange slice is basically my hard drive of "revolutionary game ideas" collecting digital dust since 2014. The actual coding? Just enough to remember why I hate debugging. And that tiny red sliver for playtesting? That's what we call "clicking the start button twice before giving up and daydreaming about more features we'll never implement." Honestly, this chart is missing the 40% wedge for "watching YouTube tutorials that make you feel productive without writing a single line of code."