bad code Memes

The Ternary Operator Fever Dream

The Ternary Operator Fever Dream
This code is what happens when someone discovers nested ternary operators and thinks they've unlocked godmode. The developer is trying to add the correct suffix to a date (1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc.) with a chain of ternaries that would make even Satan say "that's a bit excessive." The best part? It completely ignores 4-20, 24-30, and anything else ending with those numbers. Enjoy debugging this masterpiece when it breaks on the 4th of literally any month! Future maintainers will be adding this developer to their prayer lists tonight.

Some Actual Code I Found Inside A Game

Some Actual Code I Found Inside A Game
The code is a perfect example of why game developers shouldn't be allowed near RNGs unsupervised! ๐Ÿ˜‚ What we're looking at is a glorious mess of Python where someone created two nearly identical functions ( count_greater_than_11 and count_greater_than_5 ) that generate random numbers between 1-20 and increment a counter when the number exceeds a threshold. But wait! The function names and comments don't even match - one says "greater than 11" in the comment but checks for > 10 in the code, while the other claims to check for > 5 but actually checks for > 4! And then there's that lonely is_divisible_by_7 function at the bottom, just hanging out with no apparent connection to anything else. It's like someone started implementing their own version of RNG bias with specific magic numbers, got bored halfway through, and shipped it anyway. This is probably why that boss battle feels unfairly difficult every 7th attempt...

The Evolution Of Infinite Loops

The Evolution Of Infinite Loops
The evolution of infinite loops in programming is like watching someone slowly lose their sanity. First, there's the naive while(1) - honest work, gets the job done. Then the galaxy brain move: while(1 || !0) because why use one truth when you can use two redundant ones? But the final boss? That #define ever (; ;) for ever macro - pure chaotic evil disguised as poetry. It's what happens when developers get too clever for their own good and decide readability is for the weak. Ten years from now, the poor soul who inherits this code will be questioning their career choices.

C Plus Plus In JavaScript

C Plus Plus In JavaScript
The classic "I know kung fu" moment, but for programming nerds. Some hotshot claims they "use C++ in JavaScript" and when challenged, reveals their groundbreaking technique: a for loop with c++ as the iterator. That's like saying you speak French because you can say "bonjour." The violence in the last panel is completely justified - that's just standard code review procedure for crimes against programming languages. This is why senior devs drink so much coffee.

Rate My Is Even And Odd Function

Rate My Is Even And Odd Function
OH. MY. GOD. Someone actually wrote a function that loops through EVERY NUMBER from 0 to x just to check if a number is even or odd?! ๐Ÿ’€ Instead of using the BASIC MODULO OPERATOR that exists in LITERALLY EVERY PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE, this psychopath decided "you know what would be fun? Let's make the computer count to potentially INFINITY and then return True if i equals 1 or 2!" The absolute AUDACITY to write if i == 1: return True for even numbers and if i == 2: return True for odd numbers has me SCREAMING into my mechanical keyboard! This is what happens when you code at 4am after your fifth energy drink!

You Guys Are Doing It All Wrong

You Guys Are Doing It All Wrong
OH. MY. GOD. Who wrote this abomination?! ๐Ÿ˜ฑ The function isEven(x) is literally comparing a number to the STRING "even"?! The absolute AUDACITY! Instead of doing basic math like x % 2 == 0 , some chaotic evil developer decided to check if a number equals the word "even"! This is the coding equivalent of using a chainsaw to spread butter. I can't even begin to process the mental gymnastics required to create this monstrosity. And the worst part? Someone, somewhere is probably using this in production RIGHT NOW. ๐Ÿ’€

Kill The Feature, Not The Customer

Kill The Feature, Not The Customer
The existential journey of a developer who's reached their breaking point! From endless meetings to Jira tickets that multiply like rabbits, this chat perfectly captures that moment when you realize the solution to user problems isn't murder (thankfully) but feature pruning. The gradual progression from general frustration to the specific epiphany about killing unused features instead of customers is *chef's kiss* - the exact thought process every developer has at 2:47pm on a Thursday after the fourth "urgent" meeting of the day. And that "developer mid life crisis" response with the laughing emoji? Pure validation that we're all silently screaming inside our professionally calm exteriors while maintaining our code and sanity.

Who Cares About Your Bad Code Anyway

Who Cares About Your Bad Code Anyway
The perfect representation of code review culture in the wild. Guy 1 frantically points out someone's terrible code like it's a five-alarm fire, while Guy 2 delivers the crushing reality check: absolutely nobody gives a damn. The same devs who'll argue for hours about tabs vs. spaces will happily ignore a production codebase that looks like it was written by randomly mashing a keyboard. Welcome to software engineering, where we're simultaneously perfectionists and completely fine with duct-taped solutions that "just work." The duality of programmer.

Unless You Work With Aeroplanes Or Something

Unless You Work With Aeroplanes Or Something
The classic developer mantra: "Nobody is going to die if you write bad software" paired with "Faking it till you make it should probably be fine" and a dead platypus in the middle. The perfect encapsulation of that voice in your head justifying why it's OK to push untested code to production on a Friday afternoon. Just remember, somewhere an aviation software engineer is reading this and having a panic attack.

No Harm Done

No Harm Done
The eternal developer dilemma: ship it broken or fix it properly? The left panel shows the guilt of knowing you've written garbage code. The right panel is that sweet rationalization that kicks in โ€“ "It's fine, that feature's buried so deep in the settings menu even QA probably didn't test it." We've all been there. That quick fix at 4:55 PM on Friday that you KNOW will come back to haunt you in six months when someone actually discovers that page. But hey, what's the worst that could happen? (Narrator: The worst did, in fact, happen.)

Anti-Pattern Alpha

Anti-Pattern Alpha
There's commenting code, and then there's weaponizing comments. While you're over there documenting your elegant solutions, some developers are crafting elaborate manifestos defending why they chose to implement a singleton that manages 47 global variables with a switch statement that's 300 lines long. The truly diabolical part? The comments are so well-written that the next developer thinks, "This person clearly thought this through." No, Chad, they just have excellent PR skills for their terrible code crimes.

Take Chances, Make Messes

Take Chances, Make Messes
Living dangerously means writing code so questionable that the senior dev has to personally intervene. It's like leaving landmines in your pull request and watching the explosion from a safe distance. Career advancement through chaos theory.