bad code Memes

The evolution of infinite loops from "acceptable" to "summoning Satan himself": First panel: while (true) {} - The classic approach. Clean, honest, straightforward. "Yes, I'm creating an infinite loop on purpose. What about it?" Second panel: while (["*"].Contains["*"]) {} - Getting spicy! The unnecessary complexity is like wearing a tuxedo to take out the trash. It still does the same thing, but with style . Third panel: while (Random.Int(Integer.MaxInt) is Number) {} - Now we're just being passive-aggressive. "It's not technically infinite... but it is." The programming equivalent of "I'm not touching you!" Final panel: while (DateTime.Now - Breaking the fabric of space-time. This isn't just bad code, it's a cry for help. The compiler isn't even mad anymore, just disappointed.

When your junior dev asks "What's the modulo operator?" and you're too deep into your fifth coffee to explain basic math. Nothing says "I'm a professional" like hardcoding 50 if-statements to check if a number is even when return number % 2 == 0; would do the trick. But hey, at least it's thoroughly tested for numbers 1-22! The face in the corner is all of us reviewing this code during a PR. Silent horror.

The aristocratic smugness is palpable . Nothing screams "tech nobility" like optimizing garbage code instead of rewriting it properly. Sure, you've made your spaghetti script run 1000x faster, but it's still held together with duct tape and prayers. The true art of programming isn't writing good code—it's making bad code perform so well that nobody questions its existence. And then strutting around the office like you've just invented quantum computing.

Behold the magnificent ReverseSign() function that single-handedly brought down an entire postal system! Instead of the elegant return -d , some genius decided to check if the number is negative, make it positive, and then... subtract it from itself and multiply by 2? That's like driving to the grocery store by first going to Mexico, then Canada, then back home. The real horror is that this cosmic abomination of code was responsible for financial calculations that sent innocent people to prison. Imagine having your life destroyed because someone couldn't grasp the concept of a negative sign. This is what happens when you let people who failed "Programming 101" write mission-critical financial software. Fun fact: This code is so bad that it fails for the number 0 (which doesn't change sign) and introduces potential overflow errors. It's like building a nuclear reactor with duct tape and wishful thinking.