bad code Memes

This Saves Two Cycles (And My Employment)

This Saves Two Cycles (And My Employment)
Someone's job security strategy is absolutely chef's kiss . Instead of writing clean, maintainable code, they've created a function that always returns 2, labeled it as "job security," and then made two helper functions that literally copy memory addresses to change the return value. Nothing says "I'll never be fired" like writing code that only you understand and using memcpy() to overwrite function implementations instead of, you know, just changing the original function. Because why write one line of code when you can write twenty that require a hazmat suit to maintain? Bonus points for the "NEVER call this function" comments that scream "I'm the only one who knows which landmines not to step on." Pure evil genius at work here.

Match Made In Heaven

Match Made In Heaven
The eternal dance between hackers and terrible code continues! Top panel shows a desperate hacker searching for vulnerable apps, while the bottom panel reveals r/VibeCoding - that magical place where developers proudly share their "works of art" built with duct tape, prayers, and zero security considerations. It's like watching nature documentaries where predators and prey find each other through some cosmic algorithm. Those devs posting "I built this app in 2 days with no prior experience!" are basically sending engraved invitations to every hacker on the planet. After 15 years in the industry, I've learned the first rule of security: the easier something was to build, the easier it is to break.

The Six Circles Of Loop Hell

The Six Circles Of Loop Hell
Ah, nothing says "I was definitely sober and making good decisions" like nesting 6 for-loops into oblivion. This masterpiece of indentation is what happens when caffeine replaces blood in your circulatory system at 2AM. That beautiful staircase of closing brackets is basically the developer's version of those Russian nesting dolls, except each one contains a slightly more confused version of yourself. The best part? That O(n⁶) time complexity is going to run so slowly that you'll have time to rethink your entire career before it finishes executing. It's not a bug, it's a built-in meditation feature!

The Selective Optimization Syndrome

The Selective Optimization Syndrome
The duality of programmer perfectionism is a beautiful thing to behold. Top left: spending 47 hours meticulously organizing virtual factories in Factorio with conveyor belts that would make Marie Kondo weep tears of joy. Top right: obsessing over system architecture diagrams until your eyes bleed because "IT MUST BE PERFECT." Meanwhile, bottom left: the actual code you're paid to write has security so weak it might as well be a "Please Don't Hack Me" sticky note. Password literally hardcoded as "Password"? *chef's kiss* Bottom right: villain from a silent film declaring "MY JOB HERE IS DONE" because hey, it compiles and passes that one test you wrote! The optimization is clearly happening in all the wrong places. But the code runs in production, so... ship it!

It Works (Somehow)

It Works (Somehow)
The pinnacle of software engineering: a digital clock implementation that would make computer science professors weep. This masterpiece features arrays with missing values, commented out time libraries (because who needs those?), nested loops that would make Dante add another circle to hell, and the iconic comment "//fuck i++" which perfectly captures the developer's spiritual journey. Yet somehow, against all laws of programming and human decency, the output shows a working clock counting from 11:56 to 00:02. It's the coding equivalent of building a rocket with duct tape and prayers—and watching it actually reach orbit.

Sorry, I Forgot To Print The Code Out

Sorry, I Forgot To Print The Code Out
Oh. My. GOD! The expectations vs. reality of code audits is sending me to the GRAVE! 💀 Top panel: The pristine, politically-charged algorithm that Elon thinks he'll discover in Twitter's codebase - a smoking gun that automatically deletes Trump tweets and bans authors! Bottom panel: The absolute HORROR SHOW he'll actually find - a cursed "isEven" function with a switch statement that returns undefined for 0, false for 1, true for 2, and false for 3. With a desperate plea comment "Please don't look at this" from some poor dev who KNEW they committed crimes against humanity! The reality of tech acquisitions: you pay $44 billion only to discover the backend is held together with duct tape, prayers, and questionable logic that would make computer science professors weep uncontrollably!

O(n) Authentication: When Your Login System Is Also A Performance Test

O(n) Authentication: When Your Login System Is Also A Performance Test
The function loops through ALL USERS to find one with matching credentials instead of using a proper query. The comment is the chef's kiss: "This only works because there are not many users." It's like saying "my car doesn't need brakes because I don't drive fast." Bonus security nightmare: they're storing password hashes but comparing them directly instead of hashing the input password first. This authentication is basically a time bomb wrapped in spaghetti code!

The Karma Of Code: What Goes Around Compiles Around

The Karma Of Code: What Goes Around Compiles Around
The perfect karma loop: we write garbage code, feed it to AI, then act shocked when AI spits garbage back at us. It's like teaching a parrot all your worst swear words and then being offended when it curses at your in-laws. The AI didn't invent bad code—it just holds up a mirror to our collective coding sins. Next time you're cursing at GitHub Copilot's suggestions, remember: that monstrosity is built on the foundation of your stackoverflow copy-paste crimes.

This Entire Codebase Must Be Purged

This Entire Codebase Must Be Purged
Nothing strikes fear into a developer's soul quite like inheriting a "vibe-coded" codebase. You know the type—written by someone who was "feeling it" at 2AM, fueled by energy drinks and hubris. No comments, variable names like magicNumber42 and iKnowWhatImDoing , and functions that would make Cthulhu weep. Just like Arthas from Warcraft deciding an entire city needed cleansing, sometimes the only rational response to legacy code is total annihilation. Rewrite from scratch? Absolutely justified. That's not technical debt—it's a technical crime scene.

Let's Create A Programming Nightmare

Let's Create A Programming Nightmare
The programming community's favorite pastime: creating yet another language nobody asked for! Imagine taking JavaScript's type coercion, PHP's inconsistent naming conventions, C++'s memory management, Python's GIL, and Java's verbosity—then mashing them into one horrific Frankenstein's monster of a language. The compiler would generate 200 warnings just to print "Hello World" and the documentation would be written exclusively in regex. The only thing more terrifying than using this language would be explaining it during a job interview.

Help Fix My Program (And Maybe My Itching Problem)

Help Fix My Program (And Maybe My Itching Problem)
Ah, the classic "my code doesn't work but I'll share it anyway" scenario. Some poor soul wrote a C++ program in Notepad (first red flag) with what appears to be a legitimate header and main function, but then decided to include their personal discomfort as debug output. That moment when you're so deep in debugging hell that your physical discomfort makes it into your print statements. We've all been there at 3 AM, except most of us have the good sense to delete those lines before asking for help. Pro tip: If your balls are itching, scratch them before posting your code to Stack Overflow. Your code review and your personal hygiene should remain separate concerns.

Terrible Auth: The Digital Doorman Who Always Says Yes

Terrible Auth: The Digital Doorman Who Always Says Yes
The first part of this authentication function is actually doing its job—checking if the password matches. But then comes the security masterpiece: if (true == true) . Congratulations, you've created the digital equivalent of a bouncer who checks your ID and then lets you in anyway because "yep, gravity still works!" This function will authenticate literally anyone who gets past the first check... or fails it and just keeps trying. Security experts hate this one weird trick!