Redux Goes Brrr

When you ask a junior dev to implement OAuth and they take "social login" to a whole new dimension. Normal OAuth providers? Boring! Let's authenticate with a potato, your mom, and Beef Caldereta instead! Nothing says "secure authentication flow" like logging in with a PDF or your physical address. The cherry on top is "Login with Caution" - the only button that's actually giving sound security advice here.

Content 72 of Javascript developers are bad at math. I'm glad I'm in the other 38

Content STOP DOING COMPUTER SCIENCE Computers were supposed to solve math, NOT to be programmed C is a LETTER, not a language Wanna print() something? Write it in a PAPER with a PEN "I'm writing a recursive method with threads to optimize the CPU usage in a 0.02" THIS IS A NONSENSICAL STATEMENT MADE BY DERANGED PEOPLE Look at what PROGRAMMERS have been demanding your respect for, after all the led lights we put in their computers: (This is real COMPUTER SCIENCE, done by real COMPUTER SCIENTISTS): os.syal FUNNY GOLORED LETTERS 178 COMPILATION ERRORS????? A FAKE TEAPOT YOU CAN'T USE IF PROGRAMMING WAS REAL HOW COME NOBODY THOUGHT IN DOING while(true) print(money); THEY PLAYED US FOR ABSOLUTE FOOLS

Content Boolean (0) false Boolean("0") true 0 "0" f true 6. JS Well yes, but actually no

The infamous "2! = 2" equation creates a perfect divide between two worlds. In mathematics, the factorial operator (!) means "multiply by all positive integers less than or equal to this number" - so 2! equals 2×1=2. Correct! Mathematicians nod in agreement. But programmers see something entirely different. In code, "!=" is the inequality operator meaning "not equal to." So "2 != 2" is a blatantly false statement that evaluates to false/0/no. The compiler would laugh if it could. The spacing (or lack thereof) is the silent villain in this syntax tragedy. One tiny space would have prevented this interdisciplinary conflict!

Content I Am Devloper iamdevloper Me: Flat Earth Society people are just plain silly Also me: If I run my code again with zero changes, it'll maybe work 9 49 17 900 4k Flat Earth Society FlatEarthOrg Replying to iamdevloper I mean, if you're writing JavaScript, that's not the worst approach. 4:20pm 12 Sep 2018 Twitter Web Client 3h